Artwork

Content provided by Jonathan Lancaster and Matthew McKenna, Jonathan Lancaster, and Matthew McKenna. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jonathan Lancaster and Matthew McKenna, Jonathan Lancaster, and Matthew McKenna or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 55: An Endorsement of Whataboutism, Tankies and Moral Equivalence with Justin Podur

1:15:18
 
Share
 

Manage episode 316249519 series 3262193
Content provided by Jonathan Lancaster and Matthew McKenna, Jonathan Lancaster, and Matthew McKenna. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jonathan Lancaster and Matthew McKenna, Jonathan Lancaster, and Matthew McKenna or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Matt was joined by Justin Podur to discuss the terms "whataboutism," "tankies" and "moral equivalence" as useful tools for anti imperialists, despite imperialist attempts to dismiss them. Justin is the founder of the Anti Empire Project and Anti Empire project Podcast. He is the author of America’s Wars on Democracy in Rwanda and the DR Congo and The Path of the Unarmed. He is the co-author of Extraordinary Threat: The U.S. Empire, the Media, and Twenty Years of Coup Attempts in Venezuela Justin is also an Associate Professor at York University's Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change.

Discussed in this Episode:

- The origins of "whataboutism," how it has been used, and why imperialists are so quick to dismiss it as a tactics

- The racist origins of imperialists dismissing calls for racial equality as "whataboutism" throughout the the Cold War

- A discussion about how literally EVERY BEHAVIOR the United States accuses other nations of are behaviors that US either engages in itself, or supports governments that do so.

- The value of "whatboutism" as a tool in argument

- The charge of being a "tankie" or engaging in moral equivalence

- Is calling out hypocrisy useful? There are endless examples, but do the imperialists actually care if they are behaving in obviously hypocritical ways?

Our Work:

Read our "In the Context of Empire" blog with corresponding and expanded posts to this content!

Find some of Matt's writing at CovertAction Magazine

Social Media: Twitter- @JonTheContrary and @Mattylongruns

Music produced by Zac McKenna- @mcktasty

  continue reading

60 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 316249519 series 3262193
Content provided by Jonathan Lancaster and Matthew McKenna, Jonathan Lancaster, and Matthew McKenna. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jonathan Lancaster and Matthew McKenna, Jonathan Lancaster, and Matthew McKenna or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Matt was joined by Justin Podur to discuss the terms "whataboutism," "tankies" and "moral equivalence" as useful tools for anti imperialists, despite imperialist attempts to dismiss them. Justin is the founder of the Anti Empire Project and Anti Empire project Podcast. He is the author of America’s Wars on Democracy in Rwanda and the DR Congo and The Path of the Unarmed. He is the co-author of Extraordinary Threat: The U.S. Empire, the Media, and Twenty Years of Coup Attempts in Venezuela Justin is also an Associate Professor at York University's Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change.

Discussed in this Episode:

- The origins of "whataboutism," how it has been used, and why imperialists are so quick to dismiss it as a tactics

- The racist origins of imperialists dismissing calls for racial equality as "whataboutism" throughout the the Cold War

- A discussion about how literally EVERY BEHAVIOR the United States accuses other nations of are behaviors that US either engages in itself, or supports governments that do so.

- The value of "whatboutism" as a tool in argument

- The charge of being a "tankie" or engaging in moral equivalence

- Is calling out hypocrisy useful? There are endless examples, but do the imperialists actually care if they are behaving in obviously hypocritical ways?

Our Work:

Read our "In the Context of Empire" blog with corresponding and expanded posts to this content!

Find some of Matt's writing at CovertAction Magazine

Social Media: Twitter- @JonTheContrary and @Mattylongruns

Music produced by Zac McKenna- @mcktasty

  continue reading

60 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide