))
Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Parts 1-4 #PeerRevWk17
Manage episode 187567060 series 1544398
Content provided by J&J Editorial and J Editorial. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by J&J Editorial and J Editorial or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Parts 1-4 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at
1. What transparency means 2. How transparency benefits the researcher 3. How transparency benefits the public 4. How transparency addresses the limitations of traditional peer review
Music: www.bensound.com
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
11 episodes
Share
