))
Specific Performance
Manage episode 329824234 series 3355479
Content provided by Gaurav Pathak. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Gaurav Pathak or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Where the contract for no fault of the plaintiff becomes impossible, Section 21 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 enables award of compensation in lieu and substitution of the specific performance. So far as the determination of the amount of compensation, it has been held that the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act may safely be taken to be the measure of damages subject, of course, to the deduction therefrom of money value of the services, time and energy expended by the original land owner in pursuing the claims of compensation and the expenditure incurred by him in the litigation culminating in the award. Tune in as we discover how this principle played out in case of Ajit and Sukhbir.
Cause Title: Sukhbir v. Ajit Singh
Case Number: Civil Appeal 1653 of 2021
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: LNIND 2021 SC 155
Link to Judgment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sl8ZiqUzoWoNiierVKoJ6Oy4eYmb-tmY/view?usp=sharing
Instagram: lawandbehold
--- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/lawandbehold/message49 episodes
Share
