Artwork

Content provided by NonObviouswithHughHansen and Hugh Hansen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by NonObviouswithHughHansen and Hugh Hansen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 20: Paul Michel

1:12:31
 
Share
 

Manage episode 350419245 series 2404337
Content provided by NonObviouswithHughHansen and Hugh Hansen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by NonObviouswithHughHansen and Hugh Hansen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this episode of the podcast, Hugh sits down with Paul Michel, retired Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Paul is now a consultant spending most of his time on patent policy. Specifically, advocating for revising patent law to improve clarity, predictability and making patents more reliable and enforceable when valid. Special concerns include eligibility, PTAB, injunctions, claim construction, obviousness and damages. Hugh and Paul’s conversation covers: ● Paul’s extensive legal experience ranging from working on the Watergate investigations to supervising the FBI. ● The importance of law students developing legal writing skills and analytical skills outside the classroom. ● The role and responsibilities of the Chief Judge in a circuit court. ● How courts can easily lose sight of the practical consequences of what they decide and write. ● The disconnect between Congress and IP courts. ● For lawyers, the importance of real-world facts and data when writing amicus briefs. ● The chaos that was and is caused by the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc..
  continue reading

20 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 350419245 series 2404337
Content provided by NonObviouswithHughHansen and Hugh Hansen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by NonObviouswithHughHansen and Hugh Hansen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this episode of the podcast, Hugh sits down with Paul Michel, retired Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Paul is now a consultant spending most of his time on patent policy. Specifically, advocating for revising patent law to improve clarity, predictability and making patents more reliable and enforceable when valid. Special concerns include eligibility, PTAB, injunctions, claim construction, obviousness and damages. Hugh and Paul’s conversation covers: ● Paul’s extensive legal experience ranging from working on the Watergate investigations to supervising the FBI. ● The importance of law students developing legal writing skills and analytical skills outside the classroom. ● The role and responsibilities of the Chief Judge in a circuit court. ● How courts can easily lose sight of the practical consequences of what they decide and write. ● The disconnect between Congress and IP courts. ● For lawyers, the importance of real-world facts and data when writing amicus briefs. ● The chaos that was and is caused by the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc..
  continue reading

20 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide