Artwork

Content provided by Numetrica City. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Numetrica City or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

F Dividends

1:16
 
Share
 

Manage episode 400983822 series 3114980
Content provided by Numetrica City. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Numetrica City or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Forget dividends, it is a trap! John is a lawyer and asked me to review his financial statements. While I was reviewing the income statements, I noticed that the total salary for the 12-month period was 45K.

I looked in more detail on his corporation QuickBooks Online (QBO) file and notice his salary was at 22K.

I looked at John and said, you made less than your receptionist?! His response was Moe I’m growing the company. I said totally wrong but explain your rational. He said, I don’t take high salary so I keep more money in the corporation and then I can use the money to grow my company. We looked at QBO again this time on the balance sheet. Total cash in the company was $5K. So I said your rational makes sense but wrong since you haven’t saved any money. I told him, look, you are a great lawyer, and your salary would have been close to $200K if you worked an employee for any law offices. He further explained that his true rational was to offer his services cheaper so that he can expand his client base and eventually be more profitable. I said so how about your own income? With $22K can you live? He said oh that is easy, I’ll take dividends. I said that is BS, there is no income, cash or retained earnings. I also told him he is better off closing the corporation and work for a lawyer. This way he can make 10 times the salary. So true by closing the corporation his salary would be $200K and we would have 10X his income. I would have lost a client, but it is ok, I love to help people increase their fortune. The focus is on them and not me.
I actually told him, and he was shocked, and he said he loves his practice and totally understand the issue now. He said he will follow my advice.
Unfortunately, this is a trend with other small businesses, even I had this rational when I started.
We all assume that offering cheaper services would get us more leads. Being cheap would give us the advantage.
Basically, becoming cheap, becomes our marketing strategy.
So, I said John, being cheap and cheapest will makes you go bankrupt since that is how people will judge your service and you may win the race of becoming the lowest price lawyer and eventually go out of business.
My advice to my clients is to keep a few things in mind.
Find your company’s hourly charges.
You play 2 roles in your business; one is the owner and the other one is the worker/operator.
The worker/operator should be payroll and get paid for the hours that he is doing the work which is at par with industry or even higher if you think you are an experienced person.
For example, for John at $200K per year salary, his hourly rate should be $200,000 divided by 12 months = ~ 16,666 per month.
$16,666 divided by 150 hours per month $111
So John the business owner, let’s call him John Inc. should charge his clients enough hourly rate that John the employee will receive $111 per hour. John the employee MUST be paid salary regardless of John Inc. strategies. This is the key.
Then the next part is we want John Inc to be profitable, we want him to have at least 25% net income.
So we reverse engineer this part.
We need to calculate admin and office expenses and come up with a ratio.
I this case, let’s say the magic ratio is 40% So we know that he needs to pay $111 per hour to the employee and has also 40% other costs.
So revenues – 40% of revenues - $111 = 25% of revenues
.35% Revenue = $111 this means the hourly rate to charge a client should be at least $111/.35=$317
In our case, John was probably charging clients at $150 per hour, hence after paying the office and himself he had almost nothing left.
Fast forward our case, by the way John is not an actual name, but this is a true case only the name is changed to protect the innocent. we put John on payroll, we use Wagepoint for payroll.
Wagepoint, pays the employee through direct deposit and pays CRA the source deductions on time, files ROE and prepared T4s and records the journal entries in QBO

  continue reading

39 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 400983822 series 3114980
Content provided by Numetrica City. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Numetrica City or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Forget dividends, it is a trap! John is a lawyer and asked me to review his financial statements. While I was reviewing the income statements, I noticed that the total salary for the 12-month period was 45K.

I looked in more detail on his corporation QuickBooks Online (QBO) file and notice his salary was at 22K.

I looked at John and said, you made less than your receptionist?! His response was Moe I’m growing the company. I said totally wrong but explain your rational. He said, I don’t take high salary so I keep more money in the corporation and then I can use the money to grow my company. We looked at QBO again this time on the balance sheet. Total cash in the company was $5K. So I said your rational makes sense but wrong since you haven’t saved any money. I told him, look, you are a great lawyer, and your salary would have been close to $200K if you worked an employee for any law offices. He further explained that his true rational was to offer his services cheaper so that he can expand his client base and eventually be more profitable. I said so how about your own income? With $22K can you live? He said oh that is easy, I’ll take dividends. I said that is BS, there is no income, cash or retained earnings. I also told him he is better off closing the corporation and work for a lawyer. This way he can make 10 times the salary. So true by closing the corporation his salary would be $200K and we would have 10X his income. I would have lost a client, but it is ok, I love to help people increase their fortune. The focus is on them and not me.
I actually told him, and he was shocked, and he said he loves his practice and totally understand the issue now. He said he will follow my advice.
Unfortunately, this is a trend with other small businesses, even I had this rational when I started.
We all assume that offering cheaper services would get us more leads. Being cheap would give us the advantage.
Basically, becoming cheap, becomes our marketing strategy.
So, I said John, being cheap and cheapest will makes you go bankrupt since that is how people will judge your service and you may win the race of becoming the lowest price lawyer and eventually go out of business.
My advice to my clients is to keep a few things in mind.
Find your company’s hourly charges.
You play 2 roles in your business; one is the owner and the other one is the worker/operator.
The worker/operator should be payroll and get paid for the hours that he is doing the work which is at par with industry or even higher if you think you are an experienced person.
For example, for John at $200K per year salary, his hourly rate should be $200,000 divided by 12 months = ~ 16,666 per month.
$16,666 divided by 150 hours per month $111
So John the business owner, let’s call him John Inc. should charge his clients enough hourly rate that John the employee will receive $111 per hour. John the employee MUST be paid salary regardless of John Inc. strategies. This is the key.
Then the next part is we want John Inc to be profitable, we want him to have at least 25% net income.
So we reverse engineer this part.
We need to calculate admin and office expenses and come up with a ratio.
I this case, let’s say the magic ratio is 40% So we know that he needs to pay $111 per hour to the employee and has also 40% other costs.
So revenues – 40% of revenues - $111 = 25% of revenues
.35% Revenue = $111 this means the hourly rate to charge a client should be at least $111/.35=$317
In our case, John was probably charging clients at $150 per hour, hence after paying the office and himself he had almost nothing left.
Fast forward our case, by the way John is not an actual name, but this is a true case only the name is changed to protect the innocent. we put John on payroll, we use Wagepoint for payroll.
Wagepoint, pays the employee through direct deposit and pays CRA the source deductions on time, files ROE and prepared T4s and records the journal entries in QBO

  continue reading

39 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide