))
Rebuilding Democracy (Pt. 2) - Disagreement and Civility
Manage episode 278198615 series 2827257
Content provided by J. Paul Neeley. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by J. Paul Neeley or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
“Democracy runs on disagreement: it is by means of citizens hashing out their differences that democracy can achieve better political outcomes.”
In Part 2 of their podcast, Turi and Bob Talisse follow on from their discussion of Equal Citizenship (and why polarization strains that ideal), to discuss Disagreement and how we build democratic ‘Civility’ to make sure disagreement is working for, not against, democracy.
Disagreement is central to the democratic aspiration. Not only does it enshrine the right of individuals to participate in the democratic process, but it is epistemically useful - it helps us discover and articulate new ideas. But how can we argue properly when all our instincts push to defeat the other side rather than build with them?
Bob Talisse explains that we're programmed to argue (a good thing) but that we must remind ourselves to do so within the bounds of 'civility'. Not 'civility' in the 19th Century sense of the term, but rather 'Civic Friendship' - anchoring our argument in the idea that we're all building the same civic project together, that our disagreement is precisely what makes our collective experience so much better.
Listen in to understand:
- Deep Disagreements: the kind of differences no reasoning or logic will ever succeed in bringing together
- How (and why) we privilege winning arguments over learning from them.
- Performance Debating: why we love to argue, and why we’re so bad at differentiating real debate with playing to the gallery.
- Why politicians play to their bases rather than try to convince the other side.
- How we've merged the notion of fact and opinion.
- Civil Discourse: what it means and how we can work to build ‘Civic Friendships’.
- And whether COVID-19 might just bring us back together as societies…
“The informational environment seems directed at dissolving the distinction between knowing what happened and having a judgment about what happened.”
Learn all about the Parlia Podcast here.
Meet Turi Munthe: https://www.parlia.com/u/Turi
Learn more about the Parlia project here: https://www.parlia.com/about
And visit us at: https://www.parlia.com
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
45 episodes
Share
