Artwork

Content provided by Open to Debate. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Open to Debate or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

MOCK TRIAL: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?

53:15
 
Share
 

Manage episode 417475751 series 2140049
Content provided by Open to Debate. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Open to Debate or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

The Supreme Court will soon decide on a case surrounding a medication used for abortion, mifepristone, and whether the drug should continue to be available based on claims of safety and ethical considerations. Those in favor of restrictions argue that the FDA fast-tracked its approval without considering health impacts. Those against restriction argue the FDA made its decisions based on safety and efficiency, and it’s being targeted to further infringe on women’s rights. Now we debate: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?

Petitioner: Julia Kaye, Senior Staff Attorney at the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project

Respondent: Catherine Glenn Foster, Senior Fellow in Legal Policy at the Charlotte Lozier Institute

Judge's Chair: John Donvan, Moderator-in-Chief and Emmy award-winning journalist

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  continue reading

380 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 417475751 series 2140049
Content provided by Open to Debate. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Open to Debate or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

The Supreme Court will soon decide on a case surrounding a medication used for abortion, mifepristone, and whether the drug should continue to be available based on claims of safety and ethical considerations. Those in favor of restrictions argue that the FDA fast-tracked its approval without considering health impacts. Those against restriction argue the FDA made its decisions based on safety and efficiency, and it’s being targeted to further infringe on women’s rights. Now we debate: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?

Petitioner: Julia Kaye, Senior Staff Attorney at the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project

Respondent: Catherine Glenn Foster, Senior Fellow in Legal Policy at the Charlotte Lozier Institute

Judge's Chair: John Donvan, Moderator-in-Chief and Emmy award-winning journalist

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  continue reading

380 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide