Go offline with the Player FM app!
Episode 153: Shall Be Reduced
Archived series ("HTTP Redirect" status)
Replaced by: Oral Argument
When? This feed was archived on January 19, 2018 10:53 (). Last successful fetch was on January 19, 2018 11:48 ()
Why? HTTP Redirect status. The feed permanently redirected to another series.
What now? If you were subscribed to this series when it was replaced, you will now be subscribed to the replacement series. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 191870810 series 1298800
Constitutional and election law expert Franita Tolson joins us to talk about a little-known section of one of the most well-known parts of the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment grants rights enforceable against states, not just against the federal government. And it gives Congress a role in enforcing those rights. But did you know that it also provides an apparently severe and mandatory remedy for abridgments by states of the right to vote? You will.
This show’s links:
- Franita Tolson's faculty profile and writing
- Franita Tolson, What is Abridgment?: A Critique of Two Section Twos
- Luther v. Borden (disclaiming power under the Constitution to identify which of two rival factions was the government of Rhode Island); see also Erwin Chemerinsky, Cases Under the Guarantee Clause Should Be Justiciable
- Sharrow v. Brown at footnote 9, for an example of a court wrestling with the seemingly mandatory language of section two's reduction formula
- Shelby County v. Holder
Special Guest: Franita Tolson.
159 episodes
Archived series ("HTTP Redirect" status)
Replaced by: Oral Argument
When? This feed was archived on January 19, 2018 10:53 (). Last successful fetch was on January 19, 2018 11:48 ()
Why? HTTP Redirect status. The feed permanently redirected to another series.
What now? If you were subscribed to this series when it was replaced, you will now be subscribed to the replacement series. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 191870810 series 1298800
Constitutional and election law expert Franita Tolson joins us to talk about a little-known section of one of the most well-known parts of the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment grants rights enforceable against states, not just against the federal government. And it gives Congress a role in enforcing those rights. But did you know that it also provides an apparently severe and mandatory remedy for abridgments by states of the right to vote? You will.
This show’s links:
- Franita Tolson's faculty profile and writing
- Franita Tolson, What is Abridgment?: A Critique of Two Section Twos
- Luther v. Borden (disclaiming power under the Constitution to identify which of two rival factions was the government of Rhode Island); see also Erwin Chemerinsky, Cases Under the Guarantee Clause Should Be Justiciable
- Sharrow v. Brown at footnote 9, for an example of a court wrestling with the seemingly mandatory language of section two's reduction formula
- Shelby County v. Holder
Special Guest: Franita Tolson.
159 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.