Artwork

Content provided by Rhodri Davies. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Rhodri Davies or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Pluralism in Philanthropy

1:14:01
 
Share
 

Manage episode 364296712 series 2996310
Content provided by Rhodri Davies. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Rhodri Davies or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In this episode we take a deep dive into an issue that has been generating a lot of debate recently: is pluralism in philanthropy a good thing, or not? Including:

  • What has caused the latest furore, and what has the reaction been?
  • Is philanthropic freedom genuinely under threat, and if so why? Or is this just a straw man?
  • Should donors and foundations be free to "engage in the unfettered pursuit of their own mission, interests and prerogatives", or are there arguments for constraining this freedom?
  • Is there an inherent tension in philanthropy between individual liberty and systemic equity? How can we balance these competing demands?
  • Should we value pluralism because it enables diversity of thought and values, and provides the material for a healthy "battle of ideas" that can strengthen democracy?
  • Is pluralism a necessary part of allowing marginalised groups and communities to overcome the "tyranny of the majority" and drive social change?
  • Is accepting that civil society will contain things we may not like or agree with the necessary cost of pluralism? Is this a price worth paying?
  • Is pluralism a noble idea in theory but naive in practice, when in reality power is skewed towards defence of the status quo and vested interests?
  • Can everyday giving help to produce a form of pluralism that avoids some of the problems that come when we rely on elite philanthropy?
  • Do we need to constrain pluralism, and if so how?
  • To what extent is this a US-specific debate?
  • Do nonprofits need to be "civil" or "polite" when they disagree? Or does this ignore the historical reality of social change?

Related links

  continue reading

65 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 364296712 series 2996310
Content provided by Rhodri Davies. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Rhodri Davies or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In this episode we take a deep dive into an issue that has been generating a lot of debate recently: is pluralism in philanthropy a good thing, or not? Including:

  • What has caused the latest furore, and what has the reaction been?
  • Is philanthropic freedom genuinely under threat, and if so why? Or is this just a straw man?
  • Should donors and foundations be free to "engage in the unfettered pursuit of their own mission, interests and prerogatives", or are there arguments for constraining this freedom?
  • Is there an inherent tension in philanthropy between individual liberty and systemic equity? How can we balance these competing demands?
  • Should we value pluralism because it enables diversity of thought and values, and provides the material for a healthy "battle of ideas" that can strengthen democracy?
  • Is pluralism a necessary part of allowing marginalised groups and communities to overcome the "tyranny of the majority" and drive social change?
  • Is accepting that civil society will contain things we may not like or agree with the necessary cost of pluralism? Is this a price worth paying?
  • Is pluralism a noble idea in theory but naive in practice, when in reality power is skewed towards defence of the status quo and vested interests?
  • Can everyday giving help to produce a form of pluralism that avoids some of the problems that come when we rely on elite philanthropy?
  • Do we need to constrain pluralism, and if so how?
  • To what extent is this a US-specific debate?
  • Do nonprofits need to be "civil" or "polite" when they disagree? Or does this ignore the historical reality of social change?

Related links

  continue reading

65 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide