))
Faithless Electors: SCOTUS Decisions and Implications for November
Manage episode 313316200 series 3266018
Content provided by The American Law Institute. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The American Law Institute or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
On July 6, the Supreme Court of the United States held that states may replace and even punish “faithless electors,” the term used for a member of the U.S. Electoral College who does not vote for the presidential or vice presidential candidate they pledged to support. This episode will consider the implications of the Court’s ruling and reasoning for a broader set of questions on the Electoral College system and what might happen in this year’s election.
What if there is a 269-269 tie (hardly impossible given current political climate)? What if the electoral votes from one or more states are disputed in Congress, as might happen if a state’s legislature attempts to repudiate the certification of the state’s popular vote on the ground that it was tainted by some form of fraud (perhaps involving absentee ballots distrusted by the state’s legislature)? Is there anything that can be done now, before voting occurs in the fall, to improve the chances that any such Electoral College anomalies will be handled through the rule of law, in a way publicly perceived as appropriate under the Constitution, rather than perceived as a lawless power grab? S
Moderated by: Steven F. Huefner, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
Panelists:
- Edward B. Foley, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
- Franita Tolson, The University of Southern California Gould School of Law
- Kate Shaw, Cardozo School of Law
43 episodes
Share
