Artwork

Content provided by ARC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ARC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Counterproductive Sustainable Investing: Is Brown the New Green?

36:12
 
Share
 

Manage episode 386393737 series 2453684
Content provided by ARC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ARC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

This week, Kelly Shue, Professor of Finance at Yale School of Management, joins the podcast. Earlier this year, Professor Shue and her co-author, Professor Samuel M. Hartzmark, published “Counterproductive Sustainable Investing: The Impact Elasticity of Brown and Green Firms.” Their research paper concludes that the sustainable investing practice of divesting high-emitting companies (referred to as “brown” firms) in favor of low-emitting companies (referred to as “green” firms) is counterproductive to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Here are some of the questions that Peter and Jackie ask Professor Shue: Why did you conclude that the sustainable investing practice of divesting away from high-carbon companies towards low-carbon ones is counterproductive? What are some examples of “brown” and “green” companies? What are the shortcomings of measuring the percentage GHG emission reduction of a company, as opposed to absolute reductions? Were you surprised to learn that oil, gas, and energy-producing firms are key innovators in the United States’ green patent landscape? What are your thoughts on the anti-ESG movement, where some US states are asking their pension funds to divest ESG-orientated companies? Do you think institutional investors, who have made hard goals around reducing their financed emissions, should consider changing these goals? What are the shortcomings in using the company-level ESG ratings provided by firms such as Sustainalytics, MSCI, and Bloomberg to identify green companies?
Other content referenced in this podcast:

- Counterproductive Sustainable Investing: The Impact Elasticity of Brown and Green Firms (2023)

- The ESG-Innovation Disconnect: Evidence from Green Patenting (2021)

- Yale Insights: Green Investing Could Push Polluters to Emit More Greenhouse Gases (2023)

Please review our disclaimer at: https://www.arcenergyinstitute.com/disclaimer/

Check us out on social media:

X (Twitter): @arcenergyinst
LinkedIn: @ARC Energy Research Institute
Subscribe to ARC Energy Ideas Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Amazon Music
Spotify

  continue reading

244 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 386393737 series 2453684
Content provided by ARC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ARC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

This week, Kelly Shue, Professor of Finance at Yale School of Management, joins the podcast. Earlier this year, Professor Shue and her co-author, Professor Samuel M. Hartzmark, published “Counterproductive Sustainable Investing: The Impact Elasticity of Brown and Green Firms.” Their research paper concludes that the sustainable investing practice of divesting high-emitting companies (referred to as “brown” firms) in favor of low-emitting companies (referred to as “green” firms) is counterproductive to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Here are some of the questions that Peter and Jackie ask Professor Shue: Why did you conclude that the sustainable investing practice of divesting away from high-carbon companies towards low-carbon ones is counterproductive? What are some examples of “brown” and “green” companies? What are the shortcomings of measuring the percentage GHG emission reduction of a company, as opposed to absolute reductions? Were you surprised to learn that oil, gas, and energy-producing firms are key innovators in the United States’ green patent landscape? What are your thoughts on the anti-ESG movement, where some US states are asking their pension funds to divest ESG-orientated companies? Do you think institutional investors, who have made hard goals around reducing their financed emissions, should consider changing these goals? What are the shortcomings in using the company-level ESG ratings provided by firms such as Sustainalytics, MSCI, and Bloomberg to identify green companies?
Other content referenced in this podcast:

- Counterproductive Sustainable Investing: The Impact Elasticity of Brown and Green Firms (2023)

- The ESG-Innovation Disconnect: Evidence from Green Patenting (2021)

- Yale Insights: Green Investing Could Push Polluters to Emit More Greenhouse Gases (2023)

Please review our disclaimer at: https://www.arcenergyinstitute.com/disclaimer/

Check us out on social media:

X (Twitter): @arcenergyinst
LinkedIn: @ARC Energy Research Institute
Subscribe to ARC Energy Ideas Podcast
Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Amazon Music
Spotify

  continue reading

244 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide