Decision - Does the Confrontation Clause Bar Admission of Statements Concerning Child Abuse Made by a Child to a Teacher?

Supreme Podcast

Content provided by Supreme Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Supreme Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

9y ago 18:10

M4A•Episode home

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on August 01, 2022 18:33 (2y ago). Last successful fetch was on November 16, 2018 13:53 (5+ y ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

On this episode, we discuss the Court's decision this week in Ohio v. Clark, which considered weather a child’s out-of-court statements to a teacher in response to the teacher’s concerns about potential child abuse qualify as “testimonial” statements subject to the Confrontation Clause?

51 episodes

#Politics #Law #Oral Arguments #News