Artwork

Content provided by Bora Reed, Goldman School of Public Policy, and Berkeley Institute for Young Americans. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bora Reed, Goldman School of Public Policy, and Berkeley Institute for Young Americans or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 407: Talking the U.S. Senate—Is It Still Relevant?

18:02
 
Share
 

Manage episode 281280982 series 1988255
Content provided by Bora Reed, Goldman School of Public Policy, and Berkeley Institute for Young Americans. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bora Reed, Goldman School of Public Policy, and Berkeley Institute for Young Americans or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

The highly contentious Georgia Senate elections are right around the corner. The results will determine which party holds a Senate majority for the next two years. In this episode, we take a step back and examine the Senate as an institution in the current political context of hyperpolarization. Is it still functional as a mechanism of effective government? Maybe. Or, maybe not.

To help make sense of it all, we spoke with UC Santa Cruz politics professor and co-author of The Invention of the United States Senate, Dan Wirls, and senior contributor at The Appeal, Jay Willis, who has written extensively on the Senate filibuster. Both Dan and Jay discuss the most worrisome aspects of the Senate—equal representation of states and the filibuster as a mechanism for gridlock—as well as potential paths forward.

See show notes and full transcript here: https://gspp.berkeley.edu/research-and-impact/news/podcast/episode-407-talking-the-u.s-senateis-it-still-relevant

  continue reading

74 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 281280982 series 1988255
Content provided by Bora Reed, Goldman School of Public Policy, and Berkeley Institute for Young Americans. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bora Reed, Goldman School of Public Policy, and Berkeley Institute for Young Americans or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

The highly contentious Georgia Senate elections are right around the corner. The results will determine which party holds a Senate majority for the next two years. In this episode, we take a step back and examine the Senate as an institution in the current political context of hyperpolarization. Is it still functional as a mechanism of effective government? Maybe. Or, maybe not.

To help make sense of it all, we spoke with UC Santa Cruz politics professor and co-author of The Invention of the United States Senate, Dan Wirls, and senior contributor at The Appeal, Jay Willis, who has written extensively on the Senate filibuster. Both Dan and Jay discuss the most worrisome aspects of the Senate—equal representation of states and the filibuster as a mechanism for gridlock—as well as potential paths forward.

See show notes and full transcript here: https://gspp.berkeley.edu/research-and-impact/news/podcast/episode-407-talking-the-u.s-senateis-it-still-relevant

  continue reading

74 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide