))
How Voir Dire Fits with Appellate Practice | Robert Swafford
Manage episode 338186507 series 2677595
Content provided by Todd Smith & Jody Sanders, Todd Smith, and Jody Sanders. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Todd Smith & Jody Sanders, Todd Smith, and Jody Sanders or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Conducting an effective voir dire is both a science and an art. But ensuring that attorneys ask the correct questions to support challenges and objections requires careful planning and strategy. It also requires on-the-spot evaluations of the individual jurors and their responses. To help attorneys obtain the best jury panel, Robert Swafford, an attorney and jury consultant, created the Strike for Cause jury-selection method. Robert talks with Todd Smith and Jody Sanders about jury selection and the opportunities it presents for both trial and appellate attorneys. Robert also discusses ways that attorneys can use venire challenges and error preservation to prepare for and conduct their examination.
Love the show? Subscribe, rate, review, and share!
A special thanks to our sponsors:
Proudly presented by Butler Snow LLP
Join the Texas Appellate Law Podcast Community today:
148 episodes
Share
