#4 Dual Process Theory The Actionable UX podcast

1y ago 13:09

Content provided by Austin Acevedo. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Austin Acevedo or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Dual Process Theory suggests we have two general modes, or systems, of thinking that we use to navigate our every day lives. System 1 refers to our automatic, reactive, emotional, unconscious thought processes that occur almost instantaneously without conscious effort. System 2 refers to our mode of thinking that slow, deliberate, intentional, and analytical.

This topic is fundamental for understanding how to build intuitive product experiences.

3 months free off yearly subscription for Interaction Design Foundation:

Interested in boosting your career in UI/UX or learning how to build world-class products? The Interaction Design Foundation is offering 3 free months off your yearly membership to Actionable UX Podcast listeners! Use the link below to take advantage of this exclusive offer:
https://www.interaction-design.org/learn-ux-design?ep=the-actionable-ux-podcast

References:

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. Print.
Poole, Steven. The VR Book: Virtual Reality in Art and Culture. London: Laurence King, 2017. Print.
Nielsen, Jakob. "Mental Models." Nielsen Norman Group, 2005, www.nngroup.com/articles/mental-models/.
Nielsen, Jakob and Whitenton, Kathryn. The Aesthetic-Usability Effect. Nielsen Norman Group. 2007. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/aesthetic-usability-effect/.
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of reasoning. Annual review of psychology, 64(1), 255-286.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135-171). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Evans, J. S. B. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processing in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75(4), 451-466.
Evans, J. S. B., & Over, D. E. (1996). The two faces of reason: A dual-process account of reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 1(1), 46-52.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(5), 645-665.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Stroop/.

Frederick, Shane. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. American Economic Review, 95(4), 829-836. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732.

7 episodes

This topic is fundamental for understanding how to build intuitive product experiences.

3 months free off yearly subscription for Interaction Design Foundation:

References:

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. Print.
Poole, Steven. The VR Book: Virtual Reality in Art and Culture. London: Laurence King, 2017. Print.
Nielsen, Jakob. "Mental Models." Nielsen Norman Group, 2005, www.nngroup.com/articles/mental-models/.
Nielsen, Jakob and Whitenton, Kathryn. The Aesthetic-Usability Effect. Nielsen Norman Group. 2007. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/aesthetic-usability-effect/.
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of reasoning. Annual review of psychology, 64(1), 255-286.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135-171). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Evans, J. S. B. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processing in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75(4), 451-466.
Evans, J. S. B., & Over, D. E. (1996). The two faces of reason: A dual-process account of reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 1(1), 46-52.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(5), 645-665.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Stroop/.

Frederick, Shane. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. American Economic Review, 95(4), 829-836. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732.

Podcasts Worth a Listen

The Actionable UX Podcast « »
#4 Dual Process Theory