))
7/21/21 - Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience
Manage episode 316730614 series 3278602
Content provided by Smith Freed Eberhard. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Smith Freed Eberhard or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this week's episode, Justin Wickizer, Director of Legal Operations, discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "Washington Supreme Court Says Termination of a Contract, Not for Default, Equals a Termination for Convenience."
Here, the Washington Supreme Court illustrates how the standard specifications incorporated into the subject contract –between a contractor and the City of Puyallup –automatically converts an improper termination for default into a termination for convenience and the financial impact of the same.
25 episodes
Share
