))
Episode 159: The Case For The Reliability Of The Gospels – Conclusion
Manage episode 373356670 series 3116389
Content provided by Evan Minton. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Evan Minton or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this podcast episode, we wrap up our series on the historical case for the reliability of the gospels. I will tell the non-Christian who has been convinced by the evidence and arguments surveyed in the series what he should do next. I also have a message for non-Christians who may be resisting the evidence for non-intellectual reasons. And finally, I have a message for Christians who may want to use this material in their evangelistic encounters. The Maximal Data Approach is not the unweildy, inefficient argument that many defenders of the Minimal Facts Approach (formerly including myself) have made it out to be. In fact, when all is said and done, the Maximal Data Argument for Jesus' Resurrection might be even better. Though I still think The Minimal Facts Argument for Jesus' Resurrection is still a good argument.
To see the blog post, click here --> https://cerebralfaith.net/the-case-for-the-reliability-of-the-gospels-conclusion/
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/evan-minton/support170 episodes
Share
