Artwork

Content provided by Equal Rights Institute. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Equal Rights Institute or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Two Bad Pro-Life Responses to Bodily Rights Arguments

5:11
 
Share
 

Manage episode 201820357 series 1409951
Content provided by Equal Rights Institute. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Equal Rights Institute or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Even before ERI officially began, Josh and Tim cared a lot about helping pro-life people to think well and take pro-choice arguments seriously. They don’t think every single pro-choice argument is a good argument (there are a lot of really bad arguments on both sides), but we won’t be persuasive unless we can recognize and take the stronger pro-choice arguments seriously. In this piece, Josh addresses two bad pro-life responses to some of the stronger pro-choice arguments.

Related Links:

Josh Brahm: Understanding and Responding to Bodily Rights Arguments (includes Josh's speech): http://bit.ly/2mZugjg

The Alan Guttmacher Institute’s 2005 survey of more than 1,200 abortion patients: http://bit.ly/2IQs9VO Timothy Brahm: Autumn in the Sovereign Zone: Why “It’s My Body, I Can Do What I Want” Won’t Do: http://bit.ly/2x3TugP

Judith Jarvis Thomson’s violinist story or “people-seeds” analogy: http://bit.ly/2I0D4v0

Share the original article: http://bit.ly/2gBTlv8

ERI Website: https://EqualRightsInstitute.com

ERI Blog: https://Blog.EqualRightsInstitute.com

ERI Course: https://EquippedCourse.com

  continue reading

133 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 201820357 series 1409951
Content provided by Equal Rights Institute. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Equal Rights Institute or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Even before ERI officially began, Josh and Tim cared a lot about helping pro-life people to think well and take pro-choice arguments seriously. They don’t think every single pro-choice argument is a good argument (there are a lot of really bad arguments on both sides), but we won’t be persuasive unless we can recognize and take the stronger pro-choice arguments seriously. In this piece, Josh addresses two bad pro-life responses to some of the stronger pro-choice arguments.

Related Links:

Josh Brahm: Understanding and Responding to Bodily Rights Arguments (includes Josh's speech): http://bit.ly/2mZugjg

The Alan Guttmacher Institute’s 2005 survey of more than 1,200 abortion patients: http://bit.ly/2IQs9VO Timothy Brahm: Autumn in the Sovereign Zone: Why “It’s My Body, I Can Do What I Want” Won’t Do: http://bit.ly/2x3TugP

Judith Jarvis Thomson’s violinist story or “people-seeds” analogy: http://bit.ly/2I0D4v0

Share the original article: http://bit.ly/2gBTlv8

ERI Website: https://EqualRightsInstitute.com

ERI Blog: https://Blog.EqualRightsInstitute.com

ERI Course: https://EquippedCourse.com

  continue reading

133 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide