Artwork

Content provided by Andrew Lieb / Lauren Lieb. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Andrew Lieb / Lauren Lieb or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

DeFraming SCOTUS: Shedding Light on Who Can Challenge Regulatory Bodies

31:32
 
Share
 

Manage episode 423635889 series 2996412
Content provided by Andrew Lieb / Lauren Lieb. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Andrew Lieb / Lauren Lieb or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the abortion pill, but only to establish clearer guideposts as to when doctors can challenge the FDA in a federal lawsuit. The case revolved around private plaintiffs who objected to relaxed rules around abortion pills but failed to demonstrate a personal injury, lacking standing as a result. This decision sets an important precedent: individuals must show clear harm, not just moral or ideological objections, to challenge government rules through the court system. Join The Lieb Cast as we explore the implications of this ruling for future attempts to sue agencies based on policy disagreements alone.

  continue reading

346 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 423635889 series 2996412
Content provided by Andrew Lieb / Lauren Lieb. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Andrew Lieb / Lauren Lieb or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the abortion pill, but only to establish clearer guideposts as to when doctors can challenge the FDA in a federal lawsuit. The case revolved around private plaintiffs who objected to relaxed rules around abortion pills but failed to demonstrate a personal injury, lacking standing as a result. This decision sets an important precedent: individuals must show clear harm, not just moral or ideological objections, to challenge government rules through the court system. Join The Lieb Cast as we explore the implications of this ruling for future attempts to sue agencies based on policy disagreements alone.

  continue reading

346 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide