Artwork

Content provided by @Case4Innocence. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by @Case4Innocence or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Bonus: Rebuttal to Think Twice, Part 2

1:04:24
 
Share
 

Manage episode 397052818 series 3397416
Content provided by @Case4Innocence. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by @Case4Innocence or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In part 2 of our rebuttal, you'll hear some examples of bias, lack of context and misleading information in Think Twice that undermines their presumption of guilt. The focus of this episode is examining how Think Twice handles the evidence in the first two sex abuse cases against Michael Jackson.
What sort of fact checking process have they used to check the claims of the Chandler and Arvizo allegations? What sources are they citing? What sources are they leaving out? Who do they choose or not choose to interview?
Looking at what their reference pages leave out and looking at the people they selected to interview reveals the motive in Think Twice towards a predetermined narrative, versus a motive to finding the truth. We argue that because of what they left out, Think Twice can't cover these allegations with any degree of fairness.
For all our source material, please visit our website. You can reach out to us with any questions or comments through our website or on Twitter.
Website: www.michaeljacksoncaseforinnocence.com
Twitter: @Case4Innocence

  continue reading

26 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 397052818 series 3397416
Content provided by @Case4Innocence. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by @Case4Innocence or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In part 2 of our rebuttal, you'll hear some examples of bias, lack of context and misleading information in Think Twice that undermines their presumption of guilt. The focus of this episode is examining how Think Twice handles the evidence in the first two sex abuse cases against Michael Jackson.
What sort of fact checking process have they used to check the claims of the Chandler and Arvizo allegations? What sources are they citing? What sources are they leaving out? Who do they choose or not choose to interview?
Looking at what their reference pages leave out and looking at the people they selected to interview reveals the motive in Think Twice towards a predetermined narrative, versus a motive to finding the truth. We argue that because of what they left out, Think Twice can't cover these allegations with any degree of fairness.
For all our source material, please visit our website. You can reach out to us with any questions or comments through our website or on Twitter.
Website: www.michaeljacksoncaseforinnocence.com
Twitter: @Case4Innocence

  continue reading

26 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide