))
Understanding the Impact of AB 764 on California Local Government Redistricting
Manage episode 374878838 series 3504501
Content provided by Sheehy Strategy Group. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Sheehy Strategy Group or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
By Tom Sheehy
AB 764—legislation recently introduced by Los Angeles Assemblyman Isaac Bryan with the aim of enhancing transparency and accountability—has reignited the discourse surrounding California's redistricting procedures for local government entities.
Former Assemblyman Bonta, who now serves as the Attorney General, originally introduced the Fair Maps Act in 2019. The Fair Maps Act is a significant piece of legislation aimed at establishing a more transparent procedure for drawing political boundaries at the local level, which was widely regarded as a positive step toward good governance in redistricting.
This year, Assemblyman Bryan, who is now part of the new Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas’ leadership team, introduced AB 764 in furtherance of the Fair Maps Act. You might even call it the Fair Maps Act #2. However, one aspect of this legislation has sparked controversy. It introduces a new private right of action as an enforcement mechanism in the event that local government redistricting lines procedures aren't followed as outlined in law.
So, what does that mean? A private right of action means that any individual or any organization, or essentially any stakeholder that doesn't like the way the lines are being drawn, can file a lawsuit. Such legal battles can be time-consuming and costly.
#caleg #cabudget #cagov
25 episodes
Share
