Artwork

Content provided by Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett, Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett, Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 101: An Outside Perspective on Implicit Bias

1:15:31
 
Share
 

Manage episode 352888778 series 2313502
Content provided by Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett, Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett, Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Alexa and Yoel discuss the much trodden topic of implicit bias from a less trodden perspective: that of the general public. Offering insight into the public's views is a paper by Jeffrey Yen, Kevin Durrheim, and Romin Tafarodi, which explores public thinking about the implicit association test (IAT) through an examination of the New York Times comments section. These comments demonstrate varying reactions to the idea that negative associations with some identities - racial and otherwise - can bubble beneath the surface of our explicit attitudes. Some dismiss the IAT as "academic abstraction," while others see their scores as an opportunity for confession, or even absolution. Still others embrace the role of troll, a topic foreshadowed by our discussion of the proposed overhauling of New College of Florida.

Links:

  continue reading

113 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 352888778 series 2313502
Content provided by Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett, Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett, Yoel Inbar, Michael Inzlicht, and Alexa Tullett or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Alexa and Yoel discuss the much trodden topic of implicit bias from a less trodden perspective: that of the general public. Offering insight into the public's views is a paper by Jeffrey Yen, Kevin Durrheim, and Romin Tafarodi, which explores public thinking about the implicit association test (IAT) through an examination of the New York Times comments section. These comments demonstrate varying reactions to the idea that negative associations with some identities - racial and otherwise - can bubble beneath the surface of our explicit attitudes. Some dismiss the IAT as "academic abstraction," while others see their scores as an opportunity for confession, or even absolution. Still others embrace the role of troll, a topic foreshadowed by our discussion of the proposed overhauling of New College of Florida.

Links:

  continue reading

113 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide