Artwork

Content provided by Laura Shin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Laura Shin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Why the SEC Lawsuit Against Consensys May Hold Little Ground - Ep. 671

1:10:01
 
Share
 

Manage episode 428039264 series 1822984
Content provided by Laura Shin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Laura Shin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In this episode, crypto lawyers Kayvan Sadeghi and Sam Enzer delve into the SEC's lawsuit against Consensys, which focuses on MetaMask's swaps and staking services, and explore the implications of the SEC's stance on MetaMask acting as a broker-dealer, and the classification of its staking product as a security.

They discuss how recent rulings on Coinbase and Binance challenge the SEC's claims, and whether differing judicial opinions could lead to the Supreme Court.

Also, they talk about the potential impact of the Supreme Court striking down Chevron deference for crypto regulation.

Show highlights:

  • 00:00 Intro
  • 01:22 The key claims in the SEC's lawsuit against Consensys and how they relate to MetaMask's swaps and staking services
  • 03:42 How recent Coinbase and Binance rulings challenge the SEC's claims against Consensys
  • 09:29 Whether differing judicial opinions on whether wallets with private keys act as brokers could end up being decided by the Supreme Court
  • 12:55 How the SEC will substantiate its claims that MetaMask acts as a broker-dealer and that its staking product is a security in Texas legal briefings
  • 17:42 Why a token itself is not considered a security, according to Sam, and how this distinction affects secondary market transactions in the SEC's case against MetaMask
  • 22:14 What Lido and Rocket Pool can do in response to the SEC tangentially naming their liquid staking tokens as securities
  • 31:27 How the SEC and Consensys lawsuits will proceed, and whether conflicting rulings could arise from their parallel tracks
  • 36:35 The key distinctions in the Binance case compared to those of Coinbase and Kraken, and how the Binance ruling might impact future crypto cases
  • 50:08 What Chevron deference means and how its removal impacts crypto
  • 56:49 How the elimination of Chevron deference affects current crypto cases and legislative gridlock

Visit our website for breaking news, analysis, op-eds, articles to learn about crypto, and much more: unchainedcrypto.com

Thank you to our sponsors!

Guests:

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  continue reading

717 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 428039264 series 1822984
Content provided by Laura Shin. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Laura Shin or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In this episode, crypto lawyers Kayvan Sadeghi and Sam Enzer delve into the SEC's lawsuit against Consensys, which focuses on MetaMask's swaps and staking services, and explore the implications of the SEC's stance on MetaMask acting as a broker-dealer, and the classification of its staking product as a security.

They discuss how recent rulings on Coinbase and Binance challenge the SEC's claims, and whether differing judicial opinions could lead to the Supreme Court.

Also, they talk about the potential impact of the Supreme Court striking down Chevron deference for crypto regulation.

Show highlights:

  • 00:00 Intro
  • 01:22 The key claims in the SEC's lawsuit against Consensys and how they relate to MetaMask's swaps and staking services
  • 03:42 How recent Coinbase and Binance rulings challenge the SEC's claims against Consensys
  • 09:29 Whether differing judicial opinions on whether wallets with private keys act as brokers could end up being decided by the Supreme Court
  • 12:55 How the SEC will substantiate its claims that MetaMask acts as a broker-dealer and that its staking product is a security in Texas legal briefings
  • 17:42 Why a token itself is not considered a security, according to Sam, and how this distinction affects secondary market transactions in the SEC's case against MetaMask
  • 22:14 What Lido and Rocket Pool can do in response to the SEC tangentially naming their liquid staking tokens as securities
  • 31:27 How the SEC and Consensys lawsuits will proceed, and whether conflicting rulings could arise from their parallel tracks
  • 36:35 The key distinctions in the Binance case compared to those of Coinbase and Kraken, and how the Binance ruling might impact future crypto cases
  • 50:08 What Chevron deference means and how its removal impacts crypto
  • 56:49 How the elimination of Chevron deference affects current crypto cases and legislative gridlock

Visit our website for breaking news, analysis, op-eds, articles to learn about crypto, and much more: unchainedcrypto.com

Thank you to our sponsors!

Guests:

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  continue reading

717 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide