Artwork

Content provided by Tamler Sommers & David Pizarro, Tamler Sommers, and David Pizarro. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tamler Sommers & David Pizarro, Tamler Sommers, and David Pizarro or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 281: Choose Your Fighter

1:22:42
 
Share
 

Manage episode 408998284 series 1269586
Content provided by Tamler Sommers & David Pizarro, Tamler Sommers, and David Pizarro. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tamler Sommers & David Pizarro, Tamler Sommers, and David Pizarro or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

We dig into the biggest rivalry in Tamler’s profession, analytic vs. continental philosophy. Are analytic philosophers truly the rigorous, precise, clear thinkers they take themselves to be? And is continental philosophy really just a bunch pretentious charlatans spouting French and German gibberish and writing obscure prose to mask the incoherence of their ideas? We look at a nice paper by Neil Levy that goes beyond the stereotypes and tries to describe and explain the differences between the two schools. Plus, The University of Austin (sic) is back in the news and we have a report from someone who attended one of their Forbidden Courses. This should be so easy but the article has us deeply conflicted about what to make fun of. [Important update: Trixie is on a 5 day streak of no accidents and is a perfect little sweet girl.]

Links:

An American Education: Notes from UATX by Noah Rawlings

Levy, N. (2003). Analytic and continental philosophy: Explaining the differences. Metaphilosophy, 34(3), 284-304.

  continue reading

295 episodes

Artwork

Episode 281: Choose Your Fighter

Very Bad Wizards

3,170 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 408998284 series 1269586
Content provided by Tamler Sommers & David Pizarro, Tamler Sommers, and David Pizarro. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tamler Sommers & David Pizarro, Tamler Sommers, and David Pizarro or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

We dig into the biggest rivalry in Tamler’s profession, analytic vs. continental philosophy. Are analytic philosophers truly the rigorous, precise, clear thinkers they take themselves to be? And is continental philosophy really just a bunch pretentious charlatans spouting French and German gibberish and writing obscure prose to mask the incoherence of their ideas? We look at a nice paper by Neil Levy that goes beyond the stereotypes and tries to describe and explain the differences between the two schools. Plus, The University of Austin (sic) is back in the news and we have a report from someone who attended one of their Forbidden Courses. This should be so easy but the article has us deeply conflicted about what to make fun of. [Important update: Trixie is on a 5 day streak of no accidents and is a perfect little sweet girl.]

Links:

An American Education: Notes from UATX by Noah Rawlings

Levy, N. (2003). Analytic and continental philosophy: Explaining the differences. Metaphilosophy, 34(3), 284-304.

  continue reading

295 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide