Artwork

Content provided by Dewansh Matharoo & Shrish Sudharsan, Dewansh Matharoo, and Shrish Sudharsan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dewansh Matharoo & Shrish Sudharsan, Dewansh Matharoo, and Shrish Sudharsan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Episode 27: In God's Image (Part II) (Are Nonhuman Animals Persons? A Process Theistic Response - Daniel A. Dombrowski)

54:36
 
Share
 

Manage episode 336898225 series 3259130
Content provided by Dewansh Matharoo & Shrish Sudharsan, Dewansh Matharoo, and Shrish Sudharsan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dewansh Matharoo & Shrish Sudharsan, Dewansh Matharoo, and Shrish Sudharsan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

We familiarised ourselves with the two metaphysical views about temporal relations, and began talking about process theism in our previous episode. Today, we'll examine the remaining claims and arguments and see just how metaphysically different process theism is from classical theism and whether it can support nonhuman animal personhood. From the case study of Tuffy and Daisy, to the role of sense perception and memory in determining personhood, our conversation in this episode promises to be a fun one.

While these conversations are philosophically significant and just a lot of fun to have, they also enrich conversations surround animal rights and animal activism. In Daniel A. Dombrowski's words, "[We] need to move to a conceptual space where nonhuman animal personhood is not a shock".

Mentioned in the episode:

The Cognitive Tradeoff Hypothesis - Vsauce

Are Nonhuman Animals Persons? A Process Theistic Response

  continue reading

45 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 336898225 series 3259130
Content provided by Dewansh Matharoo & Shrish Sudharsan, Dewansh Matharoo, and Shrish Sudharsan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dewansh Matharoo & Shrish Sudharsan, Dewansh Matharoo, and Shrish Sudharsan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

We familiarised ourselves with the two metaphysical views about temporal relations, and began talking about process theism in our previous episode. Today, we'll examine the remaining claims and arguments and see just how metaphysically different process theism is from classical theism and whether it can support nonhuman animal personhood. From the case study of Tuffy and Daisy, to the role of sense perception and memory in determining personhood, our conversation in this episode promises to be a fun one.

While these conversations are philosophically significant and just a lot of fun to have, they also enrich conversations surround animal rights and animal activism. In Daniel A. Dombrowski's words, "[We] need to move to a conceptual space where nonhuman animal personhood is not a shock".

Mentioned in the episode:

The Cognitive Tradeoff Hypothesis - Vsauce

Are Nonhuman Animals Persons? A Process Theistic Response

  continue reading

45 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide