The Federalist Society's ideas have consequences for democracy

Democracy Works

Content provided by Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

3+ y ago 44:31

MP3•Episode home

Is the Federalist Society bad for democracy? There's nothing inherently wrong with groups of like-minded people organizing to share and disseminate their ideas — everyone from James Madison to Alexis de Tocqueville would agree on that. However, our guest this week argues that the group's outsized role in the courts has undermined the notion of judicial independence, one of the hallmarks of our democratic experiment.

Amanda Hollis-Brusky is an associate professor of politics at Pomona College. She is the author of Ideas with Consequences, which examines the history of the Federalist Society and how it's shaped the courts and their relationship to the other branches of government over the past 40 years.

Additional Information

Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution

Amanda's September 2020 congressional testimony

Related Episodes

The Supreme Court's politics and power

293 episodes

#Podcasting Education #Government #Politics #Constitutional #Democracy #Penn State #Vote #Election