Artwork

Content provided by Dan Quintana. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dan Quintana or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?

35:07
 
Share
 

Manage episode 378437282 series 2545218
Content provided by Dan Quintana. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dan Quintana or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige

Links

Other links
Everything Hertz on social media

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

  • $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
  • $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month

Citation

Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, September 30) "173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SG4BM

Support Everything Hertz

  continue reading

185 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 378437282 series 2545218
Content provided by Dan Quintana. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dan Quintana or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Dan and James discuss a recent paper that investigated how science journalists evaluate psychology papers. To answer this question, the researchers presented science journalists with fictitious psychology studies and manipulated sample size, sample representativeness, p-values, and institutional prestige

Links

Other links
Everything Hertz on social media

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

  • $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
  • $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month

Citation

Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2023, September 30) "173: How do science journalists evaluate psychology papers?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SG4BM

Support Everything Hertz

  continue reading

185 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide