Artwork

Content provided by USGS, Menlo Park (Scott Haefner) and U.S. Geological Survey. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by USGS, Menlo Park (Scott Haefner) and U.S. Geological Survey or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Historical Seismic Data for the Future: Preservation, Digitization, and Utility

1:00:00
 
Share
 

Manage episode 431492640 series 1399341
Content provided by USGS, Menlo Park (Scott Haefner) and U.S. Geological Survey. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by USGS, Menlo Park (Scott Haefner) and U.S. Geological Survey or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Thomas Lee, Harvard University

Since the first seismograms were recorded in the late 19th century, the seismological community has accumulated millions of ground motion records on both paper and film. While almost all analog seismic recording ended by the late 20th century, replaced by digital media, the still-extant archives of paper and film seismograms are invaluable for many ongoing scientific applications. This long-running record of ground motion is crucial for developing understanding of how both natural and anthropogenic events have changed the Earth and its processes throughout the last century.

Today, most of these records are housed in institutions with limited resources, which must prioritize certain objects or types of objects for preservation and access. For example, when seismologists today are forced to triage collections, the bulky paper-records are oftentimes more at-risk for deaccessioning than more compact film copies. However, alterations introduced in reformatting (i.e., paper to film) as well as preservation requirements of the various records are not often fully understood or appreciated. To make these decisions in an informed way, it is vital to know the stability of the recording media and the level of accuracy that can be obtained from these different records. For example, image distortion and available color depth in paper and microfilm copies can result in discrepancies in derived time series which could lead to significant errors in products such as earthquake magnitude and location.

We present lessons learned from recent experiences with modern archiving and processing of legacy seismic data. These include techniques for data rescue (including both scanning and conversion to time series), the importance of characterizing the full processing chain, and the importance of involving archivists and citizen science in preservation efforts.

  continue reading

21 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 431492640 series 1399341
Content provided by USGS, Menlo Park (Scott Haefner) and U.S. Geological Survey. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by USGS, Menlo Park (Scott Haefner) and U.S. Geological Survey or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Thomas Lee, Harvard University

Since the first seismograms were recorded in the late 19th century, the seismological community has accumulated millions of ground motion records on both paper and film. While almost all analog seismic recording ended by the late 20th century, replaced by digital media, the still-extant archives of paper and film seismograms are invaluable for many ongoing scientific applications. This long-running record of ground motion is crucial for developing understanding of how both natural and anthropogenic events have changed the Earth and its processes throughout the last century.

Today, most of these records are housed in institutions with limited resources, which must prioritize certain objects or types of objects for preservation and access. For example, when seismologists today are forced to triage collections, the bulky paper-records are oftentimes more at-risk for deaccessioning than more compact film copies. However, alterations introduced in reformatting (i.e., paper to film) as well as preservation requirements of the various records are not often fully understood or appreciated. To make these decisions in an informed way, it is vital to know the stability of the recording media and the level of accuracy that can be obtained from these different records. For example, image distortion and available color depth in paper and microfilm copies can result in discrepancies in derived time series which could lead to significant errors in products such as earthquake magnitude and location.

We present lessons learned from recent experiences with modern archiving and processing of legacy seismic data. These include techniques for data rescue (including both scanning and conversion to time series), the importance of characterizing the full processing chain, and the importance of involving archivists and citizen science in preservation efforts.

  continue reading

21 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide