Raw oral argument audio from the US Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Audio of Supreme Court opinions. Finally. Listen to full-length readings of the most current opinions as they are issued by the Court. Or, browse through a library containing dozens of landmark opinions from the past. Either way, it’s free! A rare find for SCOTUS nerds.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
MACREADS.COM promotes access to justice by transforming curated United States Supreme Court opinions into immersive, on-demand audio experiences for lawyers and non-lawyers.
…
continue reading
Leeja Miller is a real life lawyer on a mission to demystify the law and how it affects your everyday life. Every Thursday morning at 10:30am cst (that's 11:30am est/8:30am pst/3:30pm gmt) she hosts a livestream over on YouTube where she covers pop culture, current events, and the laws that shape your everyday life. But listen, sometimes sitting down to watch a video just isn't in the cards for your busy schedule. Enter the Live with Leeja Podcast, where you can hear the audio version after ...
…
continue reading
CROSSING THE LINE (CTLpod) is a verite’ style audio documentary series telling stories from the frontlines in the fight for reproductive freedom. The series follows individuals who seek abortion services and the heroes who help along the way. Each episode allows the listener to experience the numerous barriers faced and the ways people overcome them as the battle for abortion rights rages across the U.S. Visit CTLpod.com to find out more about the podcast, resources for abortion care, and in ...
…
continue reading
The Oxford English Dictionary defines a dream as “a cherished aspiration, ambition, or ideal”. What is the California dream? And how does it compare and contrast to the American dream, or – as many now understand it – the American nightmare? Can California aspire to reach her dreams within an undemocratic and dysfunctional American system? Or should California chart her own course and determine her own destiny? Hi, my name is Darin Brown, and these are just some of the questions we’ll be ask ...
…
continue reading
I hope you will follow me to my Youtube channel where I will continue to offer free access to all 350+ past episodes and audio of future high-profile Supreme Court opinions. www.whatSCOTUSwroteus.comBy Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
NEW: Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries | Federal Arbitration Act, Transportation Workers
18:17
18:17
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
18:17
Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC., decided April 12, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
NEW: FBI v. Fikre | Mootness, No Fly List
17:54
17:54
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
17:54
The unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, decided March 19, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
NEW: DeVillier v. Texas | Fifth Amendment Takings Clause
11:38
11:38
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
11:38
The unanimous opinion of the Court in DeVillier v. Texas, decided April 16, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Live Summary of the Trump Criminal Cases | Palomar College
55:06
55:06
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
55:06
I have something a little different for you today: since I often read documents from the Trump cases on the show, I thought my super nerds might be interested in hearing the audio from a guest lecture I gave last week summarizing the four Trump criminal cases at a Palomar College event held every semester called the Political Economy Days Lecture S…
…
continue reading
1
MacQuarie Infrastructure v. Moab Partners | Securities Exchange Act § 10(b)
15:31
15:31
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
15:31
The unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in MacQuarie Infrastructure Corporation, et al. v. Moab Partners, L.P., et al., decided April 12, 2024. The Court is asked whether the Second Circuit erred in holding-in conflict with the Third, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits- that a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 can support a private …
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Pulsifer v. United States | Safety-valve Relief, Mandatory Minimum Sentences
30:04
30:04
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
30:04
Part 2 of 2 of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Pulsifer v. United States, decided March 15, 2024. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-340_p86a.pdf A criminal defendant facing a mandatory minimum sentence is eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U. S. C. §3553(f)(1) only if the defendant satisfies each of the provision’s three con…
…
continue reading
1
Pulsifer v. United States | Safety-valve Relief, Mandatory Minimum Sentences
39:54
39:54
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
39:54
Part 1 of 2 of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Pulsifer v. United States, decided March 15, 2024. A criminal defendant facing a mandatory minimum sentence is eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U. S. C. §3553(f)(1) only if the defendant satisfies each of the provision’s three conditions. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get pod…
…
continue reading
1
Part 3: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States
29:36
29:36
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
29:36
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. The brief is 49 pages long, so I will be recording it in several segments. If you are interested in listening to…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States
23:19
23:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
23:19
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. If you are interested in listening to the oral arguments in this case, they are scheduled to take place later th…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States
32:35
32:35
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
32:35
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. The brief is 49 pages long, so I will be recording it in several segments. If you are interested in listening to…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: U.S. v. Trump | DOJ Response to Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Order (Documents Case)
20:20
20:20
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
20:20
Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's April 2, 2024 filing responding to Judge Cannon's order requiring preliminary proposed jury instructions and verdict forms on counts 1-32. If you need a quick explainer on the Presidential Records Act, check out mine. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: U.S. v. Trump | DOJ Response to Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Order (Documents Case)
30:00
30:00
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
30:00
Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's April 2, 2024 filing responding to Judge Cannon's order requiring preliminary proposed jury instructions and verdict forms on counts 1-32. If you need a quick explainer on the Presidential Records Act, check out mine. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…
…
continue reading
1
Lindke v. Freed | Social Media, Public Officials, First Amendment
33:19
33:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
33:19
When does a public official’s social media activity constitute state action subject to the First Amendment? Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Lindke v. Freed (March 15, 2024) and find out. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.comBy Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Concurrences, Trump v. Anderson | Colorado Republican Primary Ballot
14:07
14:07
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
14:07
Today I'll be reading both concurring opinions (which read like dissents) in Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al., decided March 4, 2024.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. Anderson | Colorado Republican Primary Ballot
27:07
27:07
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
27:07
Today I'll be reading the per curiam opinion of the Court in Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al., decided March 4, 2024.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board | Alito, Dissenting, Denial of Cert (Race, School Admissions)
17:38
17:38
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
17:38
Alito, joined by Thomas, dissenting from denial of certiorari in Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board, decided Feb 20, 2024.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Update and Mini Rant: Trump v. United States
3:43
3:43
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:43
An update with critical commentary regarding today's order granting certiorari in Trump v. United States (from a very unhappy host).By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Great Lakes Insurance v. Raiders Retreat Realty | Choice-of-Law Provisions in Maritime Contracts
27:11
27:11
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
27:11
Today I'll be reading the unanimous opinion of the Court in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC, decided Feb 21, 2024.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
McElrath v. Georgia | Double Jeopardy, Repugnancy Doctrine
18:03
18:03
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
18:03
Justice Jackson delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in McElrath v. Georgia (Feb 21, 2024)By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Finney | Justice Alito Statement, Denial of Cert
9:10
9:10
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
9:10
"Americans who do not hide their adherence to traditional religious beliefs about homosexual conduct will be 'labeled as bigots and treated as such' by the government," wrote Justice Alito, in his statement explaining why he concurred in the denial of certiorari in Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Finney (February 20, 2024).…
…
continue reading
1
Smith v. Hamm | Sotomayor, Dissenting from Denials of Stay and Certiorari (Execution by Nitrogen Hypoxia)
9:39
9:39
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
9:39
Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari in Smith v. Hamm (January 25, 2024). Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsBy Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Dept. of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz | Fair Credit Reporting Act; Federal Government Sovereign Immunity
42:13
42:13
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
42:13
The brand-new, unanimous opinion of the Court in Dept. of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz, decided February 8, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsBy Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Murray v. USB Securities | Whistleblower Protection
31:20
31:20
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
31:20
Today I'll be reading the brand-new, unanimous opinion of the Court in Murray v. USB Securities (Feb 8, 2024) regarding the whistleblower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsBy Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
Did the Colorado Supreme Court err in ordering President Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot?
…
continue reading
1
Part 6: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
11:23
11:23
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
11:23
Final episode for this opinion. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Part 5: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
21:36
21:36
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
21:36
Next episode will be the last for this opinion. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Part 4: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
13:26
13:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
13:26
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Note: These episodes may be a little…
…
continue reading
1
Part 3: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
22:32
22:32
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
22:32
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Note: These episodes may be a little…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
17:12
17:12
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
17:12
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Note: These episodes may be a little…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
13:21
13:21
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
13:21
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Note: These episodes may be a little…
…
continue reading
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the Trump Jan 6th case, as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Keep your eye out today for Part One!…
…
continue reading
1
When speech is not protected by the First Amendment | Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
10:59
10:59
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
10:59
Listen to the landmark Supreme Court opinion Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) (Free Speech, KKK, Imminent Lawless Action Test) Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Packingham v. North Carolina (2017) | Sex Offender Access to Social Media & The First Amendment
19:33
19:33
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
19:33
Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Packingham v. North Carolina (2017) Access this opinion and other helpful case information here. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Garcetti v. Ceballos (2006) | Public Employee Speech & The First Amendment
33:18
33:18
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
33:18
Over the next two episodes, I'll be reading two past opinions that will help us better understand two cases currently before the Court. The past opinions are Garcetti v. Ceballos (2006) and Packingham v. North Carolina (2017). The two cases currently before the Court are Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier; these two similar cases were…
…
continue reading
1
Part 4: Blassingame v. Trump | D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion (Dec 1, 2023)
26:13
26:13
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
26:13
This is not the yet-to-be-issued D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Jan 6th criminal case against Donald Trump (although, I plan to read that opinion as soon as it is issued). Rather, it is in response to a claim of immunity made by Donald Trump in response to several civil suits brought against him for actions surrounding the even…
…
continue reading
1
Part 3: Blassingame v. Trump | D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion (Dec 1, 2023)
16:11
16:11
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
16:11
This is not the yet-to-be-issued D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Jan 6th criminal case against Donald Trump (although, I plan to read that opinion as soon as it is issued). Rather, it is in response to a claim of immunity made by Donald Trump in response to several civil suits brought against him for actions surrounding the even…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Blassingame v. Trump | D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion (Dec 1, 2023)
34:17
34:17
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
34:17
This is not the yet-to-be-issued D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Jan 6th criminal case against Donald Trump (although, I plan to read that opinion as soon as it is issued). Rather, it is in response to a claim of immunity made by Donald Trump in response to several civil suits brought against him for actions surrounding the even…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: Blassingame v. Trump | D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion (Dec 1, 2023)
38:05
38:05
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
38:05
This is not the yet-to-be-issued D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Jan 6th criminal case against Donald Trump (although, I plan to read that opinion as soon as it is issued). Rather, it is in response to a claim of immunity made by Donald Trump in response to several civil suits brought against him for actions surrounding the even…
…
continue reading
1
Tingley v. Ferguson (2023) | Thomas & Alito Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari
12:45
12:45
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
12:45
Today I'll be reading two very brief opinions dissenting from the denial of certiorari in Tingley v. Ferguson, issued back on December 11th, 2023. The first dissent is from Justice Thomas and is only around 4 pages long; the second is Justice Alito's dissent, which is only a few paragraphs long and is written as if it were meant to be read at the e…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) | Presidential Immunity in Civil Suits
22:18
22:18
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
22:18
Listen to the majority opinion of the Supreme Court in Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) Access the text of the opinion and other essential case information here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1981/79-1738 Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts or stream directly from your browser at whatscotuswroteus.com…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) | Presidential Immunity in Civil Suits
17:55
17:55
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
17:55
Listen to the majority opinion of the Supreme Court in Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) Access the text of the opinion and other essential case information here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1981/79-1738 Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts or stream directly from your browser at https://www.whatscotuswroteus.com…
…
continue reading
Is the President's right to safeguard certain information, using his "executive privilege" confidentiality power, entirely immune from judicial review? Listen to the full opinion of the Supreme Court in Nixon v. United States (1974). Listen to audio of Supreme Court opinions on What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts.…
…
continue reading
1
Part 4: U.S. v. Trump | Memorandum Opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan (Dec 1, 2023)
22:56
22:56
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
22:56
Listen to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's Memorandum Opinion in response to Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the charges against him based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. Decided Dec 1, 2023. This is the ruling that is currently being considered by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. United States District Court, D…
…
continue reading
1
Part 3: U.S. v. Trump | Memorandum Opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan (Dec 1, 2023)
23:19
23:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
23:19
Listen to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's Memorandum Opinion in response to Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the charges against him based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. Decided Dec 1, 2023. This is the ruling that is currently being considered by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. United States District Court, D…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: U.S. v. Trump | Memorandum Opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan (Dec 1, 2023)
28:54
28:54
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
28:54
U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's Memorandum Opinion in response to Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the charges against him based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. Decided Dec 1, 2023. This is the ruling that is currently being considered by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. United States District Court, District of…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: U.S. v. Trump | Memorandum Opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan (Dec 1, 2023)
28:59
28:59
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
28:59
U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's Memorandum Opinion in response to Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the charges against him based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. Decided Dec 1, 2023. This is the ruling that is currently being considered by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. United States District Court, District of…
…
continue reading
1
The Chief Justice’s 2023 Year End Report on the Federal Judiciary
23:38
23:38
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
23:38
The Chief Justice's 2023 Year End Report on the Federal Judiciary If you would like to listen to this report from last year and the year before, you can find them in the show catalog by scrolling back to December 2022. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts, or at www.whatscotuswroteus.com…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al. | Colorado Primary Ballot Petition for Writ of Certiorari
25:26
25:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
25:26
Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al., filed January 4, 2023.By Pippah Getchell
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al. | Colorado Primary Ballot Petition for Writ of Certiorari
28:53
28:53
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
28:53
Today I'll be reading Donald Trump's petition for writ of certiorari regarding the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to exclude him from the Colorado primary election ballot - a petition that the Court recently granted. I know I still owe you all a second half to the Nixon opinion, but I've had a lot of listeners requesting to hear these documents,…
…
continue reading