))
Biting the Hand that Feeds?
Manage episode 377204840 series 3255046
Content provided by Administrative Law Review. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Administrative Law Review or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this episode of A Hard Look, Senior Technology Editor Bennett J. Nuss interviews current Washington College of Law 3L and Senior Articles Editor Mehraz Rahman regarding her comment published in ALR Volume 75.3. In this episode, we review the ongoing controversies surrounding Title IX sexual misconduct adjudication on college campuses, and how standards for holding these adjudications have changed from administration to administration over the course of the past decade. Then we turn our attention to how this process can be formalized and reformed to better serve the interests of victims, accused, and the substantial interests of justice and due process implicated in these hearings.
---
This Episode was produced by Administrative Law Review Technology Editor Anthony Aviza.
If you have any questions about this episode, the guest, the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail Bennett Nuss at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu
---
If you believe you have been a victim of sexual violence, you can use the recourses below to find help:
For AU Students, please contact the Office of Equity and Title IX.
For Non-Students: National Sexual Assault Hotline with Confidential 24/7 Support: 1-800-656-4673 Campus Sexual Violence Recourse List
---
Recommended Reading
Mehraz’s Comment (TBP) This Episode's Transcript
Withdrawal of the 2011 DCL & 2014 Q&A
U.S. Department of Education’s 2022 Proposed Amendments to Title IX Regulations
44 episodes
Share
