))
Major Questions About Major Questions Doctrine
Manage episode 380737879 series 3255046
Content provided by ALR Senior Tech Editor. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ALR Senior Tech Editor or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
On this Episode of A Hard Look, ALR Senior Technology Editor Bennett J. Nuss interviews Professor Daniel Cohen regarding the current rise of Major Questions Doctrine in American Jurisprudence in contrast to the perceived fall of Chevron Doctrine. The conversation goes from an interrogation of current judicial review methods for agency action, to investigating potential issues with Major Questions Doctrine, and concluding with thoughts about the future of judicial deference and the balance of powers as we know them.
---
This episode was produced by ALR Technology Editor, Anthony Aviza.
If you have any questions about this episode, the guest, the podcast, or if you would like to propose a topic or guest, please e-mail Bennett Nuss at ALR-Sr-Tech-Editor@wcl.american.edu
Many thanks to ALR Editor-in-Chief Madison Gestiehr and Senior Articles Editor Mehraz Rahman for their assistance in providing the transcription for this Episode.
---
Recommended Reading
This Episode’s Transcript Chevron v. Natural Recourses Defense Council Skidmore v. Swift Public Water Supply Co. v. DiPasquale FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. King v. Burwell Alabama Association of Realtors v. HHS NFIB v. OSHA West Virginia v. EPA Biden v. Nebraska
44 episodes
Share
