))
Answering Objections to Abolition Part 2
Manage episode 335858646 series 3367287
Content provided by Brandon Dodd and Abolish Abortion MO. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Brandon Dodd and Abolish Abortion MO or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
We're back again with Joshua Jenkins and Kevan Myers finishing out our two-part series on objections to an abolitionist approach to ending abortion.
Episode Guide:
5:01 - Why do we believe women (and all those involved in abortion) should be prosecuted? Aren't women victims?
8:32 - Abolition is loving to all people
16:00 - Would an abolition bill punish people who'd be involved in abortion prior to the law's implementation? Also - how would prosecuting these crimes work?
24:35 - If we passed an abolition law, it'd just get held up in court, so why should we still work to pass a law like that?
29:35 - What should a state do if that happens? What is the doctrine of lesser magistrates and interposition?
37:19 - Why are incremental laws wrong, and also, why don't they work?
45:30 - Note about the New York Times interviewing someone who performed a home abortion.
46:25 - What would a successful abolition law's implementation look like?
Links:
Our Website, where you can sign up for our newsletter - https://abolishabortionmo.org/
Video of the New York Time's expose` of a woman who performed a home abortion on herself - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjIgYs81mB8
Free the States - https://freethestates.org/
Rescue Those - https://www.rescuethose.com/
27 episodes
Share
