Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
25 subscribers
Checked 28m ago
Added four years ago
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Podcasts Worth a Listen
SPONSORED
Living together in a group is a strategy many animals use to survive and thrive. And a big part of what makes that living situation successful is listening. In this episode, we explore the collaborative world of the naked mole rat. Threshold is nonprofit, listener-supported, and independently produced. You can support Threshold by donating today . To stay connected, sign up for our newsletter . Operation frog sound! Send us your frog sounds for an upcoming episode. We want you to go out, listen for frogs and toads, and record them. Just find someone croaking, and hit record on your phone. It doesn’t matter if there’s background noise. It doesn’t even matter if you’re not sure whether or not you’re hearing an amphibian—if you think you are, we would love to get a recording from you. Please also say your name and where you are in the world, and then email the recording to us at outreach@thresholdpodcast.org…
Murder In Moscow: The State Responds To The Kohberger Bushy Eyebrow Motion (Part 2) (3/22/25)
Manage episode 472746575 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.
In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf
…
continue reading
In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf
1102 episodes
Manage episode 472746575 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In the case of State v. Bryan Kohberger, the defense filed Motion in Limine #7, seeking to exclude witness identification based on the description of "bushy eyebrows." The defense argued that the surviving roommate's (identified as D.M.) description was unreliable due to her limited observation under distressing conditions, potential impairment from alcohol, and the generic nature of the "bushy eyebrows" characteristic, which could apply to many individuals. They contended that admitting this description could unfairly prejudice the jury against Kohberger.
In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf
…
continue reading
In response, the prosecution opposed the motion, asserting that D.M.'s consistent description of the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" was both relevant and reliable. They emphasized that D.M. consistently provided this specific detail across multiple interviews, and that such a distinctive feature could assist in identifying the perpetrator. The prosecution also highlighted that a photograph of Kohberger, taken shortly after the incident, depicted him with prominent eyebrows, supporting the witness's account. They argued that the determination of whether Kohberger's eyebrows match the description should be left to the jury.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
031725-States-Response-Defendants-MiL-7-RE-Witness-Identification-Bushy-Eyebrows.pdf
1102 episodes
All episodes
×
1 The Karen Read Trial: A Recap Of What Went Down During Day 1 Of Jury Selection (4/2/25) 14:00
14:00
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked14:00
On April 1, 2025, jury selection commenced for the retrial of Karen Read, who is accused of second-degree murder in the 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. The process began with 92 potential jurors entering Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts. Judge Beverly Cannone addressed the group, explaining the case's nature and the importance of impartiality. During preliminary questioning, 78 admitted to prior knowledge of the case, and 40 had already formed opinions, highlighting the challenge of assembling an unbiased jury given the case's extensive media coverage. By the end of the day, two jurors—one man and one woman—were seated after individual interviews and questionnaire assessments. The court aims to select a total of 16 jurors, comprising 12 primary jurors and four alternates. Judge Cannone indicated that the trial is expected to last between six to eight weeks. To ensure the jury's impartiality, she expanded the buffer zone outside the courthouse to prevent demonstrators' influence, responding to reports from the first trial where jurors overheard protests during deliberations to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Karen Read case resumes with jury selection for 2nd trial | Fox News…

1 Questions Swirl In The Wake Of Virginia Robert's Instagram Post (4/2/25) 11:50
11:50
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:50
The controversy surrounding Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s “four days to live” post erupted into chaos almost instantly. As one of the most visible accusers in the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell trafficking scandal, Giuffre's sudden and cryptic tweet — “I have four days to live” — sent shockwaves through social media. The ominous message, posted without explanation, triggered immediate alarm. Conspiracy theorists speculated she was under threat from powerful figures tied to the Epstein network, while supporters feared for her safety. In a case already riddled with suspicious deaths and sealed documents, her words were seen as either a desperate cry for help or a grim warning of what happens to whistleblowers who get too close to the truth. But when Giuffre later clarified that the tweet referred to a personal situation — not a real threat on her life — the backlash was swift. Critics and commentators began to question her credibility, accusing her of fueling unnecessary panic and manipulating public emotion. Some argued that the ambiguity of her statement was reckless, especially given the high-profile nature of the Epstein case and the fragile trust placed in survivor testimonies. Even some of her supporters admitted the post had damaged the public’s perception of her reliability to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Revealed: Why Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre was charged by cops - just days before claiming she was on her 'deathbed' after bus crash | Daily Mail Online…

1 Eugene Henley AKA "Big U" Gets Hit With A Massive RICO Case (Part 4) (4/2/25) 11:29
11:29
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:29
Eugene Henley Jr., widely known as "Big U," is a prominent figure in the Los Angeles music scene and a reputed leader of the Rollin' 60s Neighborhood Crips. In March 2025, Henley was indicted on 43 federal charges, including racketeering, murder, extortion, fraud, and tax crimes. The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2025, Henley led a criminal enterprise, referred to as the "Big U Enterprise," which engaged in various illegal activities across Los Angeles. One of the most serious allegations involves the 2021 murder of an aspiring rapper identified as "R.W." According to prosecutors, R.W. was signed to Henley's music label, Uneek Music, and recorded a defamatory song about Henley. In response, Henley allegedly traveled to Las Vegas, confronted R.W., and fatally shot him before leaving his body in a desert ditch off Interstate 15. Henley is also accused of exploiting his anti-gang charity, Developing Options, as a front for fraudulent activities. While presenting the organization as dedicated to providing alternatives to gang involvement for South Los Angeles youth, Henley allegedly embezzled large donations from celebrities and companies, diverting funds into his personal bank account. Notably, Developing Options received significant funding from the City of Los Angeles's Mayor’s Office through the Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) Foundation, which includes federal funds. Beyond these charges, Henley faces accusations of submitting fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief loans, engaging in extortion and robbery, and participating in human trafficking activities. Prosecutors allege that he used his influence within the Rollin' 60s and other street gangs to intimidate businesses and individuals, expanding his enterprise's power through violence and fear. Additionally, Henley purportedly leveraged social media platforms, documentaries, and interviews to bolster his reputation and instill fear, furthering the reach of his criminal organization. Henley was taken into federal custody on March 19, 2025, and is scheduled for arraignment on April 8. If convicted on all charges, he faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov-uscourts-cacd-962315-1-0.pdf…

1 Eugene Henley AKA "Big U" Gets Hit With A Massive RICO Case (Part 3) (4/1/25) 11:19
11:19
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:19
Eugene Henley Jr., widely known as "Big U," is a prominent figure in the Los Angeles music scene and a reputed leader of the Rollin' 60s Neighborhood Crips. In March 2025, Henley was indicted on 43 federal charges, including racketeering, murder, extortion, fraud, and tax crimes. The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2025, Henley led a criminal enterprise, referred to as the "Big U Enterprise," which engaged in various illegal activities across Los Angeles. One of the most serious allegations involves the 2021 murder of an aspiring rapper identified as "R.W." According to prosecutors, R.W. was signed to Henley's music label, Uneek Music, and recorded a defamatory song about Henley. In response, Henley allegedly traveled to Las Vegas, confronted R.W., and fatally shot him before leaving his body in a desert ditch off Interstate 15. Henley is also accused of exploiting his anti-gang charity, Developing Options, as a front for fraudulent activities. While presenting the organization as dedicated to providing alternatives to gang involvement for South Los Angeles youth, Henley allegedly embezzled large donations from celebrities and companies, diverting funds into his personal bank account. Notably, Developing Options received significant funding from the City of Los Angeles's Mayor’s Office through the Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) Foundation, which includes federal funds. Beyond these charges, Henley faces accusations of submitting fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief loans, engaging in extortion and robbery, and participating in human trafficking activities. Prosecutors allege that he used his influence within the Rollin' 60s and other street gangs to intimidate businesses and individuals, expanding his enterprise's power through violence and fear. Additionally, Henley purportedly leveraged social media platforms, documentaries, and interviews to bolster his reputation and instill fear, furthering the reach of his criminal organization. Henley was taken into federal custody on March 19, 2025, and is scheduled for arraignment on April 8. If convicted on all charges, he faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov-uscourts-cacd-962315-1-0.pdf…

1 The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 5) 12:42
12:42
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:42
Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students. The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger. Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary. The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter. In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court. (commercial at 8:05) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf…

1 The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 4) 11:22
11:22
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:22
Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students. The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger. Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary. The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter. In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court. (commercial at 8:05) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf…

1 The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 3) 13:41
13:41
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked13:41
Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students. The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger. Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary. The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter. In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court. (commercial at 8:05) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf…

1 The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 2) 11:01
11:01
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:01
Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students. The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger. Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary. The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter. In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court. (commercial at 8:05) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf…

1 The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 1) 13:15
13:15
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked13:15
Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students. The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger. Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary. The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter. In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court. (commercial at 8:05) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf…

1 Eugene Henley AKA "Big U" Gets Hit With A Massive RICO Case (Part 2) (4/1/25) 11:26
11:26
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:26
Eugene Henley Jr., widely known as "Big U," is a prominent figure in the Los Angeles music scene and a reputed leader of the Rollin' 60s Neighborhood Crips. In March 2025, Henley was indicted on 43 federal charges, including racketeering, murder, extortion, fraud, and tax crimes. The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2025, Henley led a criminal enterprise, referred to as the "Big U Enterprise," which engaged in various illegal activities across Los Angeles. One of the most serious allegations involves the 2021 murder of an aspiring rapper identified as "R.W." According to prosecutors, R.W. was signed to Henley's music label, Uneek Music, and recorded a defamatory song about Henley. In response, Henley allegedly traveled to Las Vegas, confronted R.W., and fatally shot him before leaving his body in a desert ditch off Interstate 15. Henley is also accused of exploiting his anti-gang charity, Developing Options, as a front for fraudulent activities. While presenting the organization as dedicated to providing alternatives to gang involvement for South Los Angeles youth, Henley allegedly embezzled large donations from celebrities and companies, diverting funds into his personal bank account. Notably, Developing Options received significant funding from the City of Los Angeles's Mayor’s Office through the Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) Foundation, which includes federal funds. Beyond these charges, Henley faces accusations of submitting fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief loans, engaging in extortion and robbery, and participating in human trafficking activities. Prosecutors allege that he used his influence within the Rollin' 60s and other street gangs to intimidate businesses and individuals, expanding his enterprise's power through violence and fear. Additionally, Henley purportedly leveraged social media platforms, documentaries, and interviews to bolster his reputation and instill fear, furthering the reach of his criminal organization. Henley was taken into federal custody on March 19, 2025, and is scheduled for arraignment on April 8. If convicted on all charges, he faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov-uscourts-cacd-962315-1-0.pdf…

1 Eugene Henley AKA "Big U" Gets Hit With A Massive RICO Case (Part 1) (4/1/25) 14:47
14:47
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked14:47
Eugene Henley Jr., widely known as "Big U," is a prominent figure in the Los Angeles music scene and a reputed leader of the Rollin' 60s Neighborhood Crips. In March 2025, Henley was indicted on 43 federal charges, including racketeering, murder, extortion, fraud, and tax crimes. The indictment alleges that from 2010 to 2025, Henley led a criminal enterprise, referred to as the "Big U Enterprise," which engaged in various illegal activities across Los Angeles. One of the most serious allegations involves the 2021 murder of an aspiring rapper identified as "R.W." According to prosecutors, R.W. was signed to Henley's music label, Uneek Music, and recorded a defamatory song about Henley. In response, Henley allegedly traveled to Las Vegas, confronted R.W., and fatally shot him before leaving his body in a desert ditch off Interstate 15. Henley is also accused of exploiting his anti-gang charity, Developing Options, as a front for fraudulent activities. While presenting the organization as dedicated to providing alternatives to gang involvement for South Los Angeles youth, Henley allegedly embezzled large donations from celebrities and companies, diverting funds into his personal bank account. Notably, Developing Options received significant funding from the City of Los Angeles's Mayor’s Office through the Gang Reduction Youth Development (GRYD) Foundation, which includes federal funds. Beyond these charges, Henley faces accusations of submitting fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief loans, engaging in extortion and robbery, and participating in human trafficking activities. Prosecutors allege that he used his influence within the Rollin' 60s and other street gangs to intimidate businesses and individuals, expanding his enterprise's power through violence and fear. Additionally, Henley purportedly leveraged social media platforms, documentaries, and interviews to bolster his reputation and instill fear, furthering the reach of his criminal organization. Henley was taken into federal custody on March 19, 2025, and is scheduled for arraignment on April 8. If convicted on all charges, he faces a maximum sentence of life in federal prison. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov-uscourts-cacd-962315-1-0.pdf…

1 One Chance Jane Doe Has Her Case Dismissed By Judge Liman (4/1/25) 11:35
11:35
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:35
In March 2025, a New York federal judge dismissed a sexual assault lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs. The plaintiff, identified only as "Jane Doe," alleged that Combs assaulted her at a 1995 party. The court had previously granted her until March 20 to refile the complaint under her real name, but she failed to do so, leading to the case's dismissal. Combs' legal team responded by highlighting this dismissal as indicative of a broader pattern of meritless claims brought by anonymous individuals. They emphasized that this is the second such case dismissed in its entirety and expressed confidence that other similar claims would not withstand legal scrutiny. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Diddy Gets Rare Legal Win As Judge Tosses Out 1995 Rape Allegations…

1 The Karen Read Trial: A Journey Down The Winding Road That Has Led Us To The Retrial (4/1/25) 14:16
14:16
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked14:16
In January 2022, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe was found dead in the snow outside a fellow officer's home following a night of socializing. His girlfriend, Karen Read, was subsequently charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a deadly accident, with prosecutors alleging she struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him in the freezing conditions. The initial trial concluded in July 2024 with a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury. Since then, the case has seen significant developments, including the termination of lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor for misconduct related to the investigation. Additionally, a juror from the first trial has joined Read's defense team, highlighting concerns about the investigation's integrity. Despite defense efforts to dismiss charges on double jeopardy grounds, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that Read can be retried. Jury selection for the retrial is set to commence on April 1, 2025. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Source: Karen Read and John O'Keefe: Inside evolution of Boston murder mystery since mistrial | Fox News…

1 The Karen Read Vault: The Red Solo Cup And The Jury Trip To 34 Fairview Road (4/1/25) 30:11
30:11
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked30:11
In the trial of Karen Read, the defense raised concerns about the methods used by investigators to collect evidence at the scene where Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe was found deceased. Specifically, they criticized the use of red plastic cups and a leaf blower during evidence collection, arguing that such unconventional techniques compromised the integrity of the evidence and could have led to contamination. Canton Lieutenant Paul Gallagher acknowledged that "nothing about this scene was standard" when discussing these methods. The defense suggested that the use of red Solo cups and grocery bags for collecting blood samples was inadequate and questioned the reliability of the evidence gathered in this manner. Additionally, jurors in the Karen Read murder trial visited the Canton home where O'Keefe's body was discovered. During this visit, they examined a black Lexus SUV, believed to be Read's vehicle, which was parked near the residence. The SUV was noted to be missing a taillight and had visible scratches on the right side. Prosecutors directed the jury's attention to specific areas of the vehicle, including the center console and the front driver's compartment, while the defense emphasized the importance of observing the spatial relationships of various elements at the scene, such as the flagpole, fire hydrant, and the house itself. This site visit aimed to provide jurors with a clearer understanding of the physical context surrounding the incident. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com…

1 The Karen Read Vault: Brian Higgins And His Testimony During The Trial (4/1/25) 35:59
35:59
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked35:59
In the trial of Karen Read, ATF Special Agent Brian Higgins testified about his interactions with both Read and her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, prior to O'Keefe's death. Higgins recounted that he had known O'Keefe for about a year and considered both him and Read as friends. He detailed a series of flirtatious text messages exchanged with Read in January 2022, initiated by her, which included messages where Read complimented Higgins's appearance and invited him to her house. Higgins also testified that during a visit to O'Keefe's home to watch a Patriots game, Read "planted a kiss" on him, describing it as "lip to lip." These interactions were presented to suggest potential tensions in Read and O'Keefe's relationship. During cross-examination, the defense questioned Higgins about his actions following O'Keefe's death, particularly focusing on his disposal of his personal cellphone. Higgins admitted to discarding his phone at a military base after discovering that his personal number had been exposed online, which he claimed was unrelated to the case. The defense suggested that this action could indicate an attempt to eliminate potentially incriminating evidence. Additionally, Higgins testified about his movements on the night of O'Keefe's death, stating that after leaving a gathering at Brian Albert's home, he went to the Canton Police Department to move vehicles for snow plowing, then returned home. He maintained that he did not see O'Keefe or Read at the gathering and was surprised to learn of O'Keefe's death the following morning. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com…
Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.