))
E66 Forensic Failures
Manage episode 434422328 series 3483217
Content provided by Brothers in Crime. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Brothers in Crime or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
If you thought last week’s episode about Fred Zain was disturbing, then buckle up! This week we take a look at other forensic “experts” who have made a name for themselves in all the wrong ways. Listen now to hear about these forensic failures and the associated fallout.
If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!
Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/
X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod
YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast
The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:
Below is a list of defendants who were wrongly convicted based on misconduct by Joyce Gilchrist, a forensic chemist with the Oklahoma City Police Dept
Former forensic scientist, accused of forging evidence in hundreds of cases, dies
Police Chemist Accused of Shoddy Work Is Fired - The New York Times
4 Crimes That Inspired Law & Order Episodes | Mental Floss
McCARTY v. GILCHRIST (2011) | FindLaw
Man gets $4 million over wrong rape conviction
OKC man walks free after 1992 murder conviction vacated
crime lab scandal | The Marshall Project
CBI: Forensic Scientist Manipulated Over 650 Cases
Scientist Mary Jane Burton faces allegations she altered crime evidence - Axios Richmond
Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.
Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.
68 episodes
Share
