CRACKS in the 'Coalition of the Willing' Lt Col Daniel Davis

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

#Daniel Davis #Daily News #Politics #News Talk #News #Trump #Russia #Ukraine #MAGA

24:35

It’s the very first episode of The Big Pitch with Jimmy Carr and our first guest is Phil Wang! And Phil’s subgenre is…This Place is Evil. We’re talking psychological torture, we’re talking gory death scenes, we’re talking Lorraine Kelly?! The Big Pitch with Jimmy Carr is a brand new comedy podcast where each week a different celebrity guest pitches an idea for a film based on one of the SUPER niche sub-genres on Netflix. From ‘Steamy Crime Movies from the 1970s’ to ‘Australian Dysfunctional Family Comedies Starring A Strong Female Lead’, our celebrity guests will pitch their wacky plot, their dream cast, the marketing stunts, and everything in between. By the end of every episode, Jimmy Carr, Comedian by night / “Netflix Executive” by day, will decide whether the pitch is greenlit or condemned to development hell! Listen on all podcast platforms and watch on the Netflix Is A Joke YouTube Channel . The Big Pitch is a co-production by Netflix and BBC Studios Audio. Jimmy Carr is an award-winning stand-up comedian and writer, touring his brand-new show JIMMY CARR: LAUGHS FUNNY throughout the USA from May to November this year, as well as across the UK and Europe, before hitting Australia and New Zealand in early 2026. All info and tickets for the tour are available at JIMMYCARR.COM Production Coordinator: Becky Carewe-Jeffries Production Manager: Mabel Finnegan-Wright Editor: Stuart Reid Producer: Pete Strauss Executive Producer: Richard Morris Executive Producers for Netflix: Kathryn Huyghue, Erica Brady, and David Markowitz Set Design: Helen Coyston Studios: Tower Bridge Studios Make Up: Samantha Coughlan Cameras: Daniel Spencer Sound: Charlie Emery Branding: Tim Lane Photography: James Hole…

about a year ago 41:35

MP3•Episode home

Western Ammunition Depletion:

The UK and EU have depleted their munitions stockpiles by sending old or excess supplies to Ukraine.

These supplies were often destroyed after arrival, particularly in Poland.

Europe now has little left and is borrowing money to fund further aid, with no clear return on investment.

Western Narratives vs. Reality:

Western leaders and media have repeatedly claimed Russia was on the verge of collapse—running out of ammunition, tanks, and troops—which has proven false.

In contrast, Russia has increased military production and reportedly has far superior industrial and manpower reserves compared to Ukraine and the West.

Russian Military Strength:

Russia is producing more equipment and munitions than the combined West, bolstered by support from countries like North Korea.

Russia also has a large reserve of trained military personnel they can still mobilize, unlike Ukraine.

Inevitability of Russian Advances:

If diplomatic solutions fail, Russia is likely to continue expanding on the battlefield.

Ukrainian manpower and resources are insufficient to resist a sustained Russian offensive.

Diplomacy & U.S. Role:

Unlike Western Europe, which is accused of ignoring root causes, the U.S. is engaging in deeper discussions with Russia, including post-war relations, disarmament, and economic issues.

Russian officials, particularly Lavrov, emphasize that NATO expansion into Ukraine was a red line and must be reversed permanently for peace.

Territorial Demands:

Russia dismisses the idea of returning to Ukraine’s 1991 borders.

The "minimum" Russian demands now appear to include full control over the four annexed regions and possibly more territory, especially areas with significant ethnic Russian populations.

Russian Offensive Movements:

Video and intelligence suggest Russia is mobilizing for a new offensive, especially in the Zaporizhzhia region.

These movements signal strategic intent, not just bargaining, as Russia appears ready and willing to continue advancing militarily.

Zelensky’s Position:

Ukraine continues to request more Western support, particularly Patriot missile systems, but has received little.

Ukraine’s stance remains firm on not ceding territory, though this position appears increasingly untenable given the military imbalance.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

521 episodes

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

CRACKS in the 'Coalition of the Willing' Lt Col Daniel Davis

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

11 subscribers

published about a year ago

MP3•Episode home

Western Ammunition Depletion:

The UK and EU have depleted their munitions stockpiles by sending old or excess supplies to Ukraine.

These supplies were often destroyed after arrival, particularly in Poland.

Europe now has little left and is borrowing money to fund further aid, with no clear return on investment.

Western Narratives vs. Reality:

Western leaders and media have repeatedly claimed Russia was on the verge of collapse—running out of ammunition, tanks, and troops—which has proven false.

In contrast, Russia has increased military production and reportedly has far superior industrial and manpower reserves compared to Ukraine and the West.

Russian Military Strength:

Russia is producing more equipment and munitions than the combined West, bolstered by support from countries like North Korea.

Russia also has a large reserve of trained military personnel they can still mobilize, unlike Ukraine.

Inevitability of Russian Advances:

If diplomatic solutions fail, Russia is likely to continue expanding on the battlefield.

Ukrainian manpower and resources are insufficient to resist a sustained Russian offensive.

Diplomacy & U.S. Role:

Unlike Western Europe, which is accused of ignoring root causes, the U.S. is engaging in deeper discussions with Russia, including post-war relations, disarmament, and economic issues.

Russian officials, particularly Lavrov, emphasize that NATO expansion into Ukraine was a red line and must be reversed permanently for peace.

Territorial Demands:

Russia dismisses the idea of returning to Ukraine’s 1991 borders.

The "minimum" Russian demands now appear to include full control over the four annexed regions and possibly more territory, especially areas with significant ethnic Russian populations.

Russian Offensive Movements:

Video and intelligence suggest Russia is mobilizing for a new offensive, especially in the Zaporizhzhia region.

These movements signal strategic intent, not just bargaining, as Russia appears ready and willing to continue advancing militarily.

Zelensky’s Position:

Ukraine continues to request more Western support, particularly Patriot missile systems, but has received little.

Ukraine’s stance remains firm on not ceding territory, though this position appears increasingly untenable given the military imbalance.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

521 episodes

#Daniel Davis #Daily News #Politics #News Talk #News #Trump #Russia #Ukraine #MAGA

All episodes

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Russia Advancing at Record Pace in Ukraine /Lt Col Daniel Davis 42:05

2 days ago42:05

42:05

Military Situation & Strategy: Russia's gains on the battlefield are not just about territory but about weakening Ukraine's armed forces through a war of attrition. The Ukrainian defensive lines are thinning, while Russia maintains a numerical advantage and continues to reinforce. Russia uses missiles, drones, artillery, and glide bombs to target Ukrainian manpower and logistics. Russian Strategy: Russia is focused on winning the war, not negotiating, unless on its terms. Their doctrine prioritizes manpower destruction over territorial gain. The Kremlin is acting consistently at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels to achieve total victory. Diplomatic Developments: A potential peace negotiation is being discussed for June 2 in Istanbul, but Ukraine hasn’t confirmed participation. Trump administration claims to support negotiations, encouraging both sides to talk. The U.S. is not participating directly in this upcoming meeting, potentially signaling a shift toward stepping back. Russian Peace Proposal: Russia plans to bring a memorandum to the talks, likely demanding: Ukraine's withdrawal from contested territories. Ukrainian demilitarization and “denazification”. A guarantee Ukraine will never join NATO. These terms are non-starters for Ukraine, suggesting no real breakthrough is likely. U.S. and Western Position: The U.S. publicly supports a ceasefire, but has said it may withdraw from negotiations if Russia doesn’t cooperate. The U.S. ambassador to the UN emphasized that peace depends on Russian actions. Some frustration is expressed that Zelensky shows no signs of compromise, continuing to demand more Western aid without offering diplomatic flexibility. Overall Outlook: The conflict remains deadlocked, with little prospect for meaningful negotiations in the short term. The West, Ukraine, and Russia remain far apart in their goals and expectations. The speaker criticizes the confusion in Western media and government about Russia's intentions, stating it's obvious they plan to fight until they win or force Ukraine to surrender. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Ukraine & Germnay's NEW Weapons Pact /Lt Col Daniel Davis 34:31

3 days ago34:31

34:31

The speaker discusses the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, focusing on upcoming negotiations, military dynamics, and Western involvement: Upcoming Talks: Russia and Ukraine are set to meet on Monday, June 2. Both sides are preparing "memorandums" outlining their negotiating positions, which are already well-known publicly. Stalemate in Positions: Russia hasn't changed its demands and sees no reason to. It is not "stalling" but rather continuing its military campaign while leaving the door open for talks under its strict conditions. Western Misperceptions: The West often accuses Russia of not wanting peace, but both sides continue military actions. Ukrainian attacks inside Russia are usually ignored by Western media, while Russian actions are heavily publicized. Germany’s Role: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz recently lifted range restrictions on weapons supplied to Ukraine, allowing them to strike inside Russia. Germany also plans to help Ukraine produce long-range missiles domestically, which the speaker doubts will be successful due to Russian targeting capabilities. Mutual Escalation: Both Ukraine and Russia are launching drone and missile attacks into each other’s territory. The speaker criticizes Western narratives for only highlighting Russian attacks and ignoring Ukrainian ones, calling it selective and misleading. Russian Perspective: Russia maintains it is open to negotiations but won't stop fighting unless its conditions are met. Officials warn that strikes on Russia with Western-supplied weapons could lead to retaliation against those supplying countries. Western Strategy Flawed: Supplying long-range missiles to Ukraine may escalate the war without changing the battlefield dynamics. The speaker argues these weapons haven’t proven effective and may provoke broader conflict, especially if Russia retaliates against Western nations directly. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Putin Deadline: Two Weeks - More Trump Bluster? w/Larry Johnson 46:20

3 days ago46:20

46:20

Trump’s "Deadline" to Putin: Trump vaguely set a two-week deadline to assess whether Putin is genuinely interested in ending the war in Ukraine. The speaker is skeptical about Trump’s track record with deadlines and his neutrality in this conflict. Analysis from Larry Johnson (ex-CIA analyst): Western Media Bias: Johnson criticizes Western media for presenting a one-sided narrative that paints Russia as the sole aggressor while ignoring Ukraine’s missile and drone attacks on Russian territory. Putin's Peace Terms: Putin is open to a negotiated settlement but only on his terms: Ukraine must withdraw from all territories Russia claims (and possibly more in the future). Ukraine must stay out of NATO, and NATO must stop expanding eastward. Protection for Russian-speaking populations in Ukraine. Escalating Demands: Putin's conditions are hardening, not softening. He's expanding territorial demands beyond those annexed in 2022. No Western Leverage: Johnson asserts that the West has no leverage over Putin and that Russia has lost trust in Western negotiations. Trump’s Role: Johnson criticizes Trump’s claim of neutrality, noting he contributed to the conflict by sending weapons to Ukraine and supporting militarization. Ukraine’s Position: Zelensky has rejected any withdrawal from currently held Ukrainian territories, making Putin’s conditions non-starters. Johnson argues that Ukraine doesn’t genuinely want peace if they refuse those terms. Historical Context: Johnson traces the roots of the conflict to NATO expansion and U.S. support for insurgents against Russia starting in the 1990s. He suggests Putin has patiently prepared for this confrontation. Military Activity: Johnson notes a large Russian missile and drone attack on Ukraine on May 24–25 was retaliation for Ukraine launching over 1,400 drones at Moscow in the prior week. Civilian Casualties: He claims the low number of civilian casualties from Russian strikes suggests they are not targeting civilians, unlike Ukraine. Tone and Perspective: The discussion is heavily critical of the U.S., NATO, and Ukraine. It portrays Russia as reactive rather than aggressive. The speaker emphasizes underreported facts from the Russian perspective. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Putin Fixated on War Victory, No Matter the Cost /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Andrei Martyanov 1:00:11

4 days ago1:00:11

1:00:11

Putin Fixated on War Victory, No Matter the Cost /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Andrei Martyanov See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Putin Trump: The DEEPENING DIVIDE /Lt Col Daniel Davis 38:34

4 days ago38:34

38:34

Putin Trump: The DEEPENING DIVIDE /Lt Col Daniel Davis See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Ukraine's THIN FRONT LINES - Makes Battles Impossible to sustain 40:06

4 days ago40:06

40:06

Combat Conditions and Tactics Both Russian and Ukrainian soldiers are engaged in slow, brutal fighting often carried out house by house, due to the risk posed by drones and artillery. Small infantry teams (2-4 soldiers) are common, as large groups are vulnerable to single drone or artillery strikes. Soldiers operate in trench lines, dugouts, or abandoned buildings, moving cautiously due to near-constant aerial surveillance and attacks. Drone Warfare Drones are ubiquitous and lethal. They're used for: Reconnaissance Direct attacks (e.g., one drone per soldier) Logistics (e.g., delivering food, water, and ammo to the front lines) Anti-drone tactics include: Netting over roads and vehicles Electronic warfare (effective against some, but not all, drones) Drones have changed warfare from large-scale maneuvers to micro-tactical engagements. Environmental Factors Weather and seasons significantly affect drone operations. Rain, snow, or high winds can ground drones. Foliage in summer offers cover; bare landscapes in winter increase exposure. Resupply Challenges Resupplying front-line troops is dangerous and often done via drones. Delivering essentials like food or ammo can require multiple drone trips, increasing the difficulty and slowing operations. Casualties and Strategic Objectives Russia is making slow but steady territorial gains. Their strategy prioritizes destroying Ukrainian forces over taking land. Ukraine is suffering disproportionately high casualties, largely due to inferior firepower and fewer drones. Russian superiority in glide bombs, missiles, and artillery contributes to this imbalance. Tactical Map and Changes Over Time In 2023, Ukraine had near tactical parity with fortified positions and mutually supporting defenses. By 2024–2025, many of these positions have been lost, with Russian forces advancing and Ukrainian lines thinning. Conclusion The conflict is no longer comparable to past Western wars like Desert Storm or Operation Iraqi Freedom. Instead, it reflects a new kind of warfare dominated by drones, close-quarters combat, and high-tech attrition. The war is a grinding stalemate, with innovation and adaptation playing a critical role in survival and success. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Col Doug Macgregor: Trump's Irrelevant & No Longer in Control 56:27

5 days ago56:27

56:27

Criticism of Trump and U.S. Leadership: The speaker argues that Donald Trump has become incoherent and ineffective, drastically changing his stance on Russia and Ukraine in recent months. Trump is described as failing in leadership both domestically and within NATO. He is seen as incapable of influencing events meaningfully or acting in America’s best interest. Despite his past potential to mediate or de-escalate the conflict, he is now viewed as irrelevant or powerless, overshadowed by entrenched U.S. intelligence and political actors. Russia's Stance and Strategy: Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has made clear that Russia will not accept any peace deal that leaves the Zelensky government in power. The Russian view is that the Zelensky regime would use a ceasefire to rebuild militarily, continuing the war later. Regime change in Kyiv is now seen as a necessary outcome for a lasting peace. Military Developments: Putin has announced a "buffer zone" in northern Ukraine, suggesting a new front in the war that expands deeply into Ukrainian territory. Russian military strategy may involve seizing key regions like Odessa, Kharkiv, and pushing to the Dnieper River. Russian recruitment is exceeding goals, while Ukraine is facing troop shortages and recruitment problems. Western Inaction and Miscalculation: The West, especially the U.S., is accused of ignoring or refusing to understand Russian concerns. There is frustration that Western leaders, including Trump, Macron, and others, have no real stake or understanding of the conflict. Russia views attempts at negotiations or pressure from the West as insincere and ineffective. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Russia Unleashes NEW Offensive to Win War / Lt Col Daniel Davis 41:48

6 days ago41:48

41:48

Russia is preparing a major new offensive in the war against Ukraine, potentially decisive in securing a Russian victory. Ukrainian leaders, including President Zelensky, have warned that the offensive could begin as early as June, though mounting evidence suggests it may have already started. The recent Russian drone and missile barrage—reportedly the largest of the war so far, with 350 drones and 9 missiles—has struck key Ukrainian military infrastructure, causing widespread damage and further depleting Ukraine’s already limited air defense resources. The attacks are aimed at command centers, logistics hubs, and military facilities, weakening Ukraine’s ability to maintain its front lines. If Russia continues at this intensity, Ukraine may soon lack sufficient air defenses, making it more vulnerable to deep strikes that could shift the balance of the war. In parallel, Germany has authorized Ukraine to use Taurus long-range missiles to strike targets inside Russia. This marks a significant escalation and has provoked strong warnings from Moscow. Russian officials have stated that such strikes would be seen as direct German participation in the war, potentially prompting retaliation. Russia has repeatedly stated openness to a negotiated peace—but only under strict conditions that reflect its interpretation of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution as a coup and demand demilitarization, political changes, and protections for Russian-speaking populations. However, leaders like Dmitry Medvedev suggest that Russia may prefer outright military victory, which would allow it to impose terms unilaterally. The situation is escalating on multiple fronts—with military intensity increasing, Western involvement deepening, and the window for diplomacy narrowing. The conflict may soon reach a critical turning point. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Ukraine's DIRE Situation that the West Ignores /Lt Col Daniel Davis 33:32

6 days ago33:32

33:32

The situation in Ukraine is dire and increasingly favors Russia. They claim that: Russia is strong and growing: Militarily and industrially, Russia is in good shape, with the capacity to sustain and expand the war. They are outproducing Ukraine and the West in weapons, artillery, and manpower. U.S. and Western policy is delusional: Despite evidence of Russia's growing strength, many Western political and military figures—like John Bolton and British commentators—are still claiming Russia is weakening or about to collapse, which the speaker calls detached from reality. Trump may be walking away: The speaker interprets Trump’s recent Truth Social post as a possible signal he may stop engaging in the Ukraine conflict, distancing himself from Biden, Zelensky, and Putin, whom he blames for the war. Western leadership is ignoring reality: The speaker criticizes the West for ignoring Russia’s consistent war aims (e.g., demilitarization of Ukraine, neutrality, constitutional changes), and continuing to fund a losing war. This, they argue, benefits only the defense industry, not the broader Western economies or societies. Calls for honesty and accountability: The speaker emphasizes that promoting illusions about Ukraine’s capabilities only prolongs suffering and wastes resources. They advocate for spreading “truth,” claiming only a negotiated settlement—on Russian terms—can end the war. The speaker concludes with a call for viewers to share the video to combat what they see as dangerous misinformation from mainstream media and Western officials. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
EU re-Militarization Against Russia Making Future War more Likely w/Alexander Mercouris 55:10

9 days ago55:10

55:10

The speaker discusses insights from a visit to Russia and conversations with influential figures, emphasizing a hardened Russian stance on the Ukraine war. The military-industrial leadership, though not traditional soldiers, supports Medvedev’s hardline position on achieving an unconditional surrender from Ukraine, drawing parallels to World War II sentiments. Despite the impact of Western sanctions on their businesses, they remain supportive of the Russian government’s position. There is a broad consensus among Russians—and some voices from countries like India and Angola—that the conflict stems from Western overreach, not Russian aggression. These international voices often view the war as a disruption to the global order and would prefer a negotiated settlement, though they may accept Ukraine’s loss if it occurs, blaming the West for the outcome. Medvedev’s rhetoric, often dismissed in the West, reflects a deep and resolute national sentiment. While he voices the uncompromising, militaristic narrative, Putin plays the diplomatic role, keeping the door open to negotiations while still preparing for victory through military means. On the diplomatic front, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov dismissed the idea of a ceasefire preceding peace talks, insisting on a treaty first and questioning the legitimacy of Ukraine’s leadership. This signals that Russia is not interested in Western-led frameworks for peace unless its maximalist demands, including political restructuring in Ukraine, are met. In conclusion, the dominant Russian view is one of resolve and inevitability—a belief that victory will be achieved through sustained effort and that current Western diplomacy misunderstands Russia's long-term goals and public sentiment. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
John Mearsheimer: Putin Orders BUFFER ZONE /U.S. Dazed & Confused 52:15

9 days ago52:15

52:15

John Mearsheimer: Putin Orders BUFFER ZONE /U.S. Dazed & Confused See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Russian Drone Operator Explains Warfare from his Position / Lt Col Daniel Davis 38:40

10 days ago38:40

38:40

Reconnaissance and Targeting: Drones are used in reconnaissance roles to spot targets and relay live video streams to command and artillery units. They can help adjust fire if communications fail, including using Russian-speaking team members to direct artillery. Payload Capacity and Resupply: The drones can carry significant weight, including Russian MREs, cigarettes, water bottles, and other supplies, for friendly resupply. However, heavier loads drain batteries faster, so trade-offs must be considered to avoid losing expensive drones. FPV vs. Mavic Drones: FPV (First-Person View) drones, often used as "suicide drones," have a higher failure rate due to electronic warfare (EW), but fiber-optic versions are increasingly used and are much harder to jam. Mavic drones, which are not designed to be disposable, are flown carefully to avoid losing them. They often reach their targets successfully unless entering high-EW zones, which operators try to avoid or bypass. Drone Warfare Environment: Drones have made movement on the front lines dangerous for both sides. Operators describe scenarios where it's risky to even leave trenches. Ukrainian drones are highly effective, often carrying multiple grenades. Russian operators give credit to Western support for Ukraine’s drone capabilities. Electronic Warfare & Attrition: EW can disrupt drones, destroy antennas, and force relocation, creating a cycle of constant adaptation. Warfare has become attritional—about who runs out of supplies and equipment first. Nature of Modern Warfare: The conflict is no longer characterized by close-quarters firefights. Instead, it's dominated by drones and artillery. Traditional infantry movement is rare due to the constant surveillance and threat from drones. Balance of Power: The Russian side claims superiority in manpower, artillery, armor, and air defense, but acknowledges that drone capabilities are more evenly matched between Russia and Ukraine. Despite that, the Russian speaker believes Russia also has the edge in drones. Conclusion: Modern frontline warfare in Ukraine is heavily influenced by drone technology and electronic warfare. Movement is restricted, logistics are challenged, and combat is increasingly remote and attritional. Drones serve multiple roles—reconnaissance, resupply, and direct attack—and both sides are adapting rapidly with evolving technologies. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Ukraine CeaseFire NEVER! 37:24

10 days ago37:24

37:24

Ukraine CeaseFire NEVER! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
UKRAINE RUSSIA: No Fighting End in Sight 48:28

11 days ago48:28

48:28

Trump’s Position : Former President Trump indicated he has a "red line" for U.S. involvement in the conflict but won't publicly define it. He believes the U.S. should never have been involved, calling it a "death trap." Stalemate in Negotiations : Despite recent calls and dialogue between global leaders, the positions of Ukraine and Russia have become more entrenched, with little sign of compromise. Russian Perspective : A former British official notes that Russia feels emboldened due to perceived divisions in the West and sees itself as addressing long-standing security concerns, especially NATO's eastward expansion. These concerns date back to the early 2000s. Loss of Military Dialogue : After the 2014 annexation of Crimea, military-to-military dialogue between Russia and the West was cut off. The official believes this was a serious mistake that eliminated valuable channels of understanding and conflict prevention. Zelensky's Position : Ukrainian President Zelensky has firmly rejected Russian demands, vowing never to surrender Ukrainian territory or accept ultimatums. Intractable Conflict : The gap between Russia and Ukraine’s demands remains wide. Russia insists on territorial withdrawals by Ukraine, while Ukraine refuses any concessions. Western Limitations : There's acknowledgment that while the West supports Ukraine, it has not provided enough to ensure a decisive victory. The policy has been to support just enough to resist, but not enough to win outright. Inevitable Negotiations : There’s broad agreement that the war won’t end militarily but through a negotiated settlement. However, the conditions for that remain distant. Root Causes Ignored : The West has largely failed to engage with what Russia views as the root causes of the conflict, such as NATO expansion and security concerns, which has hindered diplomatic solutions. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Russia ENDING Toxic Relationship with U.S. - Larry Johnson 41:24

12 days ago41:24

41:24

The speaker warns that while the U.S. often boasts of its capabilities, it may be falling behind technologically and socially compared to rivals like China. He uses the poor condition of U.S. infrastructure (e.g., New York subways) as a metaphor for broader national decline, contrasting it with clean and elegant Moscow subways to illustrate differing national priorities and competence. The conversation then shifts to U.S.-Russia-Ukraine tensions. Trump had a phone call with Putin and seemed optimistic, but European leaders were confused, as Putin’s public stance hadn't changed—Russia still demands Ukraine concede territory and NATO back off. Russian officials like Medvedev and Lavrov have emphasized that Ukraine's chance at remaining a sovereign state may soon vanish if no settlement is reached. Russia appears firm on expanding control to all of what it sees as “NovoRussia,” likely up to the Dnipro River, and protecting Orthodox believers in Ukraine. The discussion also critiques U.S. policy, arguing the U.S. has escalated tensions through NATO expansion and military exercises since the Clinton era, and that Trump was largely kept in the dark during his presidency by Pentagon and CIA officials. The speaker believes Russia doesn’t want endless war but will achieve its goals—peace on its terms—by force if needed. Comparisons are made to Abraham Lincoln’s Civil War stance: unity at all costs. General Jack Keane is criticized for portraying Putin as a genocidal criminal while ignoring the actions of leaders like Netanyahu. The segment concludes by transitioning to U.S. Senate discussions on Trump’s position on Gaza, indicating a broader critique of American foreign policy inconsistency. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Lusting for War with Iran is UnAmerican / Lt Col Daniel Davis 51:42

22 days ago51:42

51:42

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav The speaker passionately argues against war with Iran, asserting that such a path is immoral, unethical, and un-American. Drawing on over 20 years of military service, he explains that the U.S. military exists to defend the nation, not to coerce or dominate other countries. He criticizes political figures, particularly Republican senators like Tom Cotton, for pushing narratives that may serve foreign interests over American ones and for using fear-mongering to justify military action. He acknowledges real threats in the world but believes that some use pro-American rhetoric to justify unjust wars rooted in power and control, rather than true national defense. He supports America-first policies in terms of protecting national interests, but stresses the importance of alliances, diplomacy, and avoiding permanent enemies or entangling commitments. He argues that demands for Iran to surrender its defensive capabilities without compromise make war inevitable and undermine diplomatic progress, like the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA), which he views as a better alternative than current tensions. Ultimately, he warns that the push for war not only harms America’s global reputation and moral standing but also violates both the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Act, which require congressional approval for acts of war. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Trump Chases Cease-Fire Fantasies/ Moscow Celebrates Victory 28:03

23 days ago28:03

28:03

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav On May 9, 2025, Russia marked the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, referred to domestically as the Great Patriotic War, with a large parade in Moscow. The event proceeded without any drone strikes, despite Ukraine having launched over 500 drones in the days prior. It’s believed international pressure, possibly from the U.S. and China, discouraged further attacks to avoid a major international incident. Chinese President Xi Jinping attended the parade, sitting beside Vladimir Putin, alongside leaders from over 20 other countries, including some from Europe. The U.S. response focused on diplomacy. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce reiterated the U.S. position that a 30-day unconditional ceasefire is necessary before meaningful peace talks can begin—something she called a minimal and obvious first step. However, Russia has consistently rejected this, viewing it as a tactic to rearm Ukraine. Later, Vice President J.D. Vance appeared to take a more flexible stance, saying that while a ceasefire would be ideal, the U.S. might withdraw from mediation efforts if Russia isn't negotiating in good faith. This apparent contradiction between U.S. officials highlighted inconsistency in U.S. messaging and may undermine diplomatic leverage. The speaker criticized this mixed messaging, suggesting that Russia, currently holding a military advantage, has no incentive to agree to a ceasefire. He argued the U.S. should take a realistic and proactive stance by ending support and urging Ukraine to pursue the best deal possible now to stop further bloodshed. The Russians, he noted, have not changed their stance: they reject temporary ceasefires, which they see as ploys to rearm Ukraine, and instead demand a comprehensive peace. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
John Mearsheimer: Why the EU Can't End Russia Ukraine War 52:16

24 days ago52:16

52:16

The speakers criticize Western leaders—especially European and U.S. officials—for maintaining unrealistic expectations about achieving a "just and lasting peace" in Ukraine that includes full Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity. They argue this vision is impossible because it is fundamentally unacceptable to Russia, which sees NATO expansion and a Western-aligned Ukraine as existential threats due to its historical invasions. The conversation asserts that Russia has non-negotiable security demands and that peace will ultimately be decided on the battlefield. The West, particularly Europe, is accused of clinging to false hopes that U.S. policy—especially under a potential Trump administration—might eventually align with theirs. However, the speakers argue that this is futile, as Russia is likely to win regardless of U.S. involvement. Continued resistance by Ukraine and Europe, instead of encouraging compromise, further incentivizes Russia to secure a military victory that ensures Ukraine can never join NATO or the EU. The discussion ends with skepticism toward the EU's "porcupine strategy" of arming Ukraine to deter Russia, suggesting it may only prolong the conflict rather than lead to peace. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Trump v. Houthis: Who Backed Down 18:03

25 days ago18:03

18:03

The video discusses confusion and conflicting narratives surrounding a supposed ceasefire between the U.S. and the Houthis in the Red Sea. President Trump claimed the Houthis “capitulated,” said they wouldn’t attack ships anymore, and that the U.S. would halt bombings in response—not as part of a formal deal but based on their word. However, the Houthis deny surrendering and assert that if the U.S. stops attacking them, they’ll refrain from attacking U.S. ships—but will continue targeting vessels headed to Israel. This contradiction raises doubts about whether a ceasefire truly exists. The U.S. State Department echoed the idea that the Houthis made a verbal commitment, but emphasized they would be judged by their actions, not just words. The video highlights that Israeli officials were unaware of any agreement and are dissatisfied. It also details the disproportionate U.S. military costs in the region—estimated at $3 billion and including the loss of several F-18 jets. The speaker questions the sustainability and strategic value of the U.S. mission, expressing skepticism that the Houthis will cease attacks given their resilience and past behavior. Lastly, Senator Lindsey Graham's comments are criticized for pushing confrontation with Iran, suggesting the Houthi threat is ultimately driven by Iranian support. The speaker warns that calls for war with Iran are naive and dangerous, lacking foresight about the broader consequences. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
"Act of WAR" INDIA Strikes Pakistan / Lt Col Daniel Davis 20:48

25 days ago20:48

20:48

A recent escalation between India and Pakistan has raised fears of a potential nuclear conflict. According to reports, India has launched airstrikes targeting civilian areas in Pakistan, including a mosque and residential zones, resulting in casualties among women and children. This follows a terrorist attack on Indian civilians—allegedly by Islamist militants in Kashmir—prompting India's military response. This cycle of violence is not new. It mirrors a similar escalation in 2019, which began after a suicide bombing killed 40 Indian soldiers. At the time, India responded with airstrikes, and both countries faced off militarily. While global powers, including the U.S., urged restraint then and now, the conflict remains unresolved and deeply rooted in decades-long tensions, dating back to British India's 1947 partition and the disputed status of Kashmir. The Kashmir region is currently divided among India (55%), Pakistan (35%), and China (10%), with about 20 million people living there. Despite periods of uneasy peace, events like this keep the conflict on a "low boil", with each side accusing the other and misinformation complicating public understanding, especially for Western audiences. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Ukraine DRONES Hit Moscow 2 Nights in a Row w/Larry Johnson 56:50

26 days ago56:50

56:50

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav The speaker strongly criticizes Ukrainian attacks and claims they reinforce Russia’s belief that Ukraine’s government cannot be negotiated with and must be defeated militarily. A viewer’s suggestion that Ukraine might be probing Russian air defenses ahead of a May 9 strike is dismissed as unlikely, since Russia is not passive in its defense strategy. The speaker also discusses diplomatic warnings issued by Russia and China to Western powers, suggesting global concern over potential escalation. Despite threats, many world leaders still plan to attend Russia’s May 9 parade, signaling confidence or indifference to Ukrainian threats. Putin is portrayed as calculated and rational, taking a "manageable risk" with the parade. Claims by Ukraine that Russia may conduct a false flag attack are rejected as baseless, with the argument that Russia already has justification to act militarily and does not need to manufacture an excuse. The discussion criticizes Western military officials—especially General Ben Hodges—for endorsing attacks on the Russian parade, labeling such views as reckless and morally wrong. The May 9 parade is defended as a solemn commemoration of WWII sacrifices, not a military provocation. The speaker emphasizes that unlike the U.S., Russia paid a much higher human cost in WWII and continues to remember that history deeply. Finally, there's criticism of American foreign policy and military leadership, highlighting perceived ignorance of history, especially regarding NATO expansion and its impact on Russia. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Russian Parade in DANGER? - May 9th Great Patriotic War Parade in Moscow 21:40

27 days ago21:40

21:40

The speaker discusses the upcoming May 9th Victory Day parade in Moscow, commemorating the 80th anniversary of the Allied victory in World War II. This event is especially significant to Russia and is being celebrated with much buildup. However, concerns are raised about security risks, given the ongoing war with Ukraine and past drone attacks on Moscow. The speaker criticizes Ukrainian President Zelensky’s recent comments, where he hinted that Russia should be worried about potential attacks on that day. He suggests that while Zelensky may be detached from reality, such a move would provoke severe retaliation from Russia. A key part of the discussion centers on retired U.S. General Ben Hodges, who publicly stated that the parade is a legitimate military target because it involves troops and captured Ukrainian equipment. The speaker finds Hodges' comments irresponsible and dangerous, arguing that encouraging such an attack could lead to massive Russian retaliation—potentially even targeting Kyiv in ways Russia has so far avoided. He notes that while Ukraine and Russia are at war and strikes happen on both sides, there is a difference between what one can do versus what one should do, especially if the outcome worsens Ukraine’s strategic position. The parade, unlike a weapons factory, also involves civilian elements, making it a far more sensitive target. The speaker strongly opposes the idea of striking the parade, warning that it could remove the restraint Russia has shown so far (e.g., not targeting Ukraine’s leadership or major government buildings) and lead to a dramatic escalation of the conflict. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Putin 'Hopes" Nukes Aren't Needed in Ukraine War /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Col Jacques Baud 59:00

27 days ago59:00

59:00

Vladimir Putin began promoting the “Invisible Regiment” movement about 15–20 years ago, encouraging civilians to honor relatives who died in World War II during military parades. This reinforces a deep Russian cultural connection to sacrifice, history, and patriotism, which extends beyond just the Russian Federation to Belarusians and ethnic Russians in former Soviet states. Russians have strong emotional ties to their homeland, and this attachment creates solidarity, particularly because of shared struggles under communism. During the Cold War, many Soviet émigrés returned home because they felt alienated in the West. The breakup of the Soviet Union left many ethnic Russians in newly independent states (like Ukraine, Estonia, Georgia) where they were often marginalized. Examples include laws limiting rights for Russians, like Estonia barring them from local elections and Ukraine’s law designating Russians as non-indigenous people, reducing their rights. These exclusions help explain why Russia views conflicts in these regions as existential—not just for the country, but for the Russian nation, including those outside current Russian borders. The West often misunderstands this nuance, assuming that pressure or sanctions will cause Russia to yield. But sanctions affect ordinary Russians and deepen the sense of national pride and grievance. Unlike during the Cold War, when the West opposed a system (communism), today's actions are perceived as attacks on people themselves. Finally, the war in Ukraine is taking on the emotional intensity of a civil war, where hatred builds deeply over time. This is different from earlier wars like WWI, where enemies could still show human empathy. In Ukraine, that empathy is mostly gone, and the war has become deeply personal for many involved. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Col Doug Macgregor: Peace Talks Failing, Russia Takes Aim on the Battlefield 43:39

27 days ago43:39

43:39

Negotiated Peace May No Longer Be Possible: The chance for a negotiated settlement in the Ukraine conflict—acceptable to both sides—may have passed. Some believe it was never truly viable. Trump's Position Shifted: Trump initially tried to distance himself from the war, blaming President Biden and suggesting it wouldn't have happened under his watch. He once appeared poised to pull out of the conflict entirely, but recent actions suggest a change in direction. Trump Now "Owns" the War: Commentators argue that due to recent developments and support packages, Trump now has ownership of the Ukraine war in the public perception, despite his earlier efforts to avoid it. Pastor’s Influence and Emotional Decision-Making: A pastor close to Trump visited Ukraine, witnessed reported atrocities, and apparently influenced Trump emotionally, shifting his stance on continued involvement. US Aid Undermines Diplomacy: New U.S. aid packages (F-16 training, Patriot missiles, etc.) have further angered Russia and undermined any remaining hopes of a diplomatic solution. These actions suggest escalation rather than de-escalation. Criticism of Trump’s Advisors and Strategy: Trump is criticized for being too reactive, influenced by emotional appeals and the last person he speaks with, rather than adhering to a clear strategic vision. Russian Perspective: Putin has long believed the West, especially the U.S., cannot be trusted, and recent actions reinforce that belief. Russia is pivoting toward self-reliance and alliances with Asia and the Global South. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Days Left before Trump Will "Own" the Russia-Ukraine War Lt Col Daniel Davis 53:00

29 days ago53:00

53:00

The speaker criticizes Western military and political leadership for lacking strategic thinking in dealing with the Ukraine conflict, particularly in relation to missile defense and long-term objectives. He argues that: Missile defense systems are costly and unsustainable: The West may need to use more interceptor missiles than there are incoming ones to ensure defense, which raises logistical and financial concerns. Leadership fails to define clear objectives for such operations. Russia has strategic clarity and industrial capacity: Unlike the West, Russia has a defined objective, a strong defense industrial base, and the ability to repair and rotate damaged vehicles, allowing for sustained warfare. In contrast, Ukraine has limited repair and supply capacity, and Western military aid is drying up. Western leaders, including Trump, are indecisive: Trump hasn't taken unilateral action to influence the war's direction and risks being perceived as weak. Time is running out for him to change course, especially with Russia's symbolic May 9th Victory Day approaching. Imbalance in production capacity: Russia is expected to produce far more tanks, vehicles, missiles, and artillery shells than the U.S. and Europe combined in 2025, putting Ukraine at a severe disadvantage. Political consequences loom: If Trump fails to act decisively, he may lose control over the narrative, face backlash from both political parties, and be seen as incapable of fulfilling his promises to end the war. A broader warning: The West risks provoking Russia into broader retaliation, potentially dragging NATO members further into the conflict if missile interceptions or direct attacks on Russian forces escalate. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
The Problem w/Europe & the UKRAINE RUSSIA WAR - Alexander Mercouris 56:27

4 weeks ago56:27

56:27

The speaker discusses growing divisions within Europe over the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the West's relationship with Russia. While hardliner governments in Western and Northern Europe (like France, Germany, and the Baltics) remain committed to confrontation, other European nations—particularly in Central and Southern Europe (like Hungary, Croatia, Italy, and increasingly Germany)—are starting to push for a diplomatic resolution and restoration of relations with Russia. Economic concerns, especially the loss of cheap Russian energy, are a driving factor behind this shift. The speaker suggests that if the U.S., particularly under Trump, decides to disengage from the conflict, it will expose and accelerate this split within Europe. Without U.S. support, many European countries may abandon the current strategy and pursue direct negotiations with Russia. Regarding U.S. personnel changes, the dismissal of National Security Adviser Mike Waltz is seen as a sign that he was misaligned with Trump’s preference for diplomacy over confrontation. While being reassigned as U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Waltz’s suitability for that role is also questioned, given the diplomatic finesse it requires. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
BREAKING: Trump Nat'l Security Advisor Mike Waltz Forced Out! 20:51

4 weeks ago20:51

20:51

There has been breaking news out of Washington, D.C.—National Security Adviser Mike Waltz and his deputy Alex Wong have been fired. The firing appears sudden and surprising, especially since Waltz recently appeared on Fox News acting as if it were a normal day. While the White House has not yet made an official statement, reports suggest it's being framed as part of a staff shake-up rather than a direct response to controversy. A key reason for their dismissal appears to be the so-called "SignalGate" scandal. Waltz had created a Signal group chat that included senior officials (e.g., VP, Secretary of Defense, Tulsi Gabbard), where classified military operations were allegedly discussed. Signal, although encrypted, is not authorized for handling classified information. This misuse raised major security concerns and may have led to his removal. There was also internal conflict. Waltz reportedly pushed for harsher sanctions on Russia, which clashed with Trump's more restrained stance. Additionally, political activist Laura Loomer, a vocal supporter of Israel and Trump, had long pushed for the removal of both Waltz and Wong, accusing them of being insufficiently loyal. Loomer is now claiming credit for the firings. These firings suggest deeper tensions within the Trump team, both over security protocol violations and ideological loyalty. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Ukraine Minerals Deal Done... What About Peace? Patrik Baab & Lt Col Daniel Davis 44:09

4 weeks ago44:09

44:09

The discussion centers on the complex state of U.S. and European involvement in efforts to end the war in Ukraine, with particular focus on the Trump administration's peace proposal and shifting dynamics among key figures. Despite efforts to broker peace, including a ceasefire plan and negotiations with Ukraine and European partners, the gap between Russian and Ukrainian positions remains vast. Key developments include: Conflicting signals from U.S. leadership: Marco Rubio suggested the U.S. might walk away from talks, while General Keith Kellogg expressed optimism, citing a proposed 30-day comprehensive ceasefire. The Trump administration's seven-point plan includes keeping Crimea and occupied Donbas regions effectively Russian, keeping Ukraine out of NATO, and halting U.S. support—measures seen as heavily favoring Moscow. Russia’s demands, per Foreign Minister Lavrov, include formal recognition of annexed territories, demilitarization of Ukraine, lifting sanctions, and ending arrest warrants—all of which are unacceptable to Ukraine and the West. Both sides of the conflict have hardliners pushing to prolong the war: Ukrainian right-wing factions and Russian separatists, making peace talks difficult. European divisions are highlighted, with fears that some in Europe prefer the war to continue until a more favorable U.S. administration returns. Germany is criticized for stationing troops in Lithuania, which the speaker calls illegal and provocative, potentially escalating tensions further with Russia. Finally, the overarching narrative is that peace is elusive, and any agreement will be extremely difficult and time-consuming, possibly more so than the Vietnam War peace process. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Ukraine Russia War: No Peace Deal in Sight w/Larry Johnson 51:53

5 weeks ago51:53

51:53

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav Trump's Cabinet and Ukraine War: Former President Trump is meeting with his cabinet to assess the direction of the Russia-Ukraine war and is frustrated by slow diplomatic progress. He feels things aren’t going the way he envisioned, despite some positive momentum compared to previous administrations. Ukraine Minerals Deal Delays: A key issue is a delayed Ukraine minerals deal, initially meant to be signed in February. Although the agreement was reportedly finalized, Ukraine introduced last-minute changes, causing confusion. Critics argue the deal is being drawn out unnecessarily, and the economic viability of Ukrainian rare earth minerals is questionable due to a lack of processing infrastructure. Russian Military Advances: Russia is making significant advances in eastern Ukraine, particularly in regions like Kharkiv and Sumy, with potential for future referendums to join Russia. Analysts predict more territory could fall under Russian control by summer. Trump’s Role and Expectations: Trump is described as having unrealistic expectations for a peace deal and downplays his own administration's role in escalating tensions. From 2017 to 2021, Ukraine's military significantly expanded under his presidency, and U.S.-led NATO exercises increased. Russia's Firm Stance: Russia, through Foreign Minister Lavrov, remains firm: any ceasefire requires full Ukrainian withdrawal from occupied regions, international recognition of annexed territories, demilitarization of Ukraine, and lifting of Western sanctions. These terms have remained consistent since the start of the war. Outlook: Analysts believe Trump either misjudges Russia’s resolve or is setting up to withdraw from negotiations. Russia’s conditions are hardening with time, and without Western agreement, further territorial losses for Ukraine are likely. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .…

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

1
Gaza Bloodshed / Zelensky's Veiled Threat to Attack Russia's Victory Parade w/Steve Jermy 53:51

5 weeks ago53:51