Artwork

Content provided by Bethany A. Tucker & Mariëlle S. Smith, Bethany A. Tucker, and Mariëlle S. Smith. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bethany A. Tucker & Mariëlle S. Smith, Bethany A. Tucker, and Mariëlle S. Smith or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Season 1 Episode 7 - Tokenism in Literature

34:06
 
Share
 

Manage episode 306837630 series 2988413
Content provided by Bethany A. Tucker & Mariëlle S. Smith, Bethany A. Tucker, and Mariëlle S. Smith. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bethany A. Tucker & Mariëlle S. Smith, Bethany A. Tucker, and Mariëlle S. Smith or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In this episode of Doing Diversity in Writing, we—Bethany and Mariëlle—talk about the third common pitfall when representing diverse characters: tokenism.

More specifically, we talk about:

  • what tokenism is and why it is problematic
  • why characters such as JK Rowling’s Cho Chang are the perfect example of tokenism
  • the custom of turning diverse characters into token sidekicks or “bit-players”
  • how Cassandra Clare avoids tokenism in her Shadowhunter series
  • strategies to prevent tokenism in your fiction writing

Some quotes from this week’s episode:

“Tokenism is inclusion for the sake of inclusion. It’s not about making any actual changes but about appearances.”

“If we just merely add a few diverse characters to our stories just so our writing looks inclusive, chances are the story doesn’t leave any room for these characters’ lived experiences and realities to be fully investigated. If we only include them to make sure a particular minority is present within our writing so that we look like open-minded and progressive writers, we run the risk of reducing these characters to one-dimensional summaries of what we think their community is like and thinks like.”

“You can add a whole set of characters from the same community, but if they’re all more or less the same and don’t contribute to the plot beyond being their identity marker, if they get to contribute to the plot at all, it’s still tokenism. It’s really about the depth and complexity that a character is allowed to bring with them beyond whatever identity markers they might carry.”

“Proper research into our characters’ cultural, historical and political backgrounds will go a long way in creating more well-rounded characters with a developed background.”

“Even if you only have one character from a particular minority community in your work, allowing them space to be their own person beyond their identity markers will go a long way in making sure they don’t become tokens and in showing the diversity that exists within each and every community.”

And here are the (re)sources we mentioned on the show:

Please note that this is not the original video of Rachel Rostad performing the slam poem. At the time of uploading this episode, it was no longer available on YouTube.

This week’s bonus material can be found here: https://representationmatters.art/2021/11/11/episode7

To be the first to know when our next episode drops, subscribe to our newsletter here: https://landing.mailerlite.com/webforms/landing/r3p6g8

As always, we’d love for you to join the conversation by filling out our questionnaires.

Our Doing Diversity in Writing – Writer Questionnaire can be filled in at https://forms.gle/UUEbeEvxsdwk1kuy5

Our Doing Diversity in Writing – Reader Questionnaire can be filled in at https://forms.gle/gTAg4qrvaCPtqVJ36

Don’t forget, you can find us at https://representationmatters.art/ and on https://www.facebook.com/doingdiversityinwriting

  continue reading

31 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 306837630 series 2988413
Content provided by Bethany A. Tucker & Mariëlle S. Smith, Bethany A. Tucker, and Mariëlle S. Smith. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bethany A. Tucker & Mariëlle S. Smith, Bethany A. Tucker, and Mariëlle S. Smith or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In this episode of Doing Diversity in Writing, we—Bethany and Mariëlle—talk about the third common pitfall when representing diverse characters: tokenism.

More specifically, we talk about:

  • what tokenism is and why it is problematic
  • why characters such as JK Rowling’s Cho Chang are the perfect example of tokenism
  • the custom of turning diverse characters into token sidekicks or “bit-players”
  • how Cassandra Clare avoids tokenism in her Shadowhunter series
  • strategies to prevent tokenism in your fiction writing

Some quotes from this week’s episode:

“Tokenism is inclusion for the sake of inclusion. It’s not about making any actual changes but about appearances.”

“If we just merely add a few diverse characters to our stories just so our writing looks inclusive, chances are the story doesn’t leave any room for these characters’ lived experiences and realities to be fully investigated. If we only include them to make sure a particular minority is present within our writing so that we look like open-minded and progressive writers, we run the risk of reducing these characters to one-dimensional summaries of what we think their community is like and thinks like.”

“You can add a whole set of characters from the same community, but if they’re all more or less the same and don’t contribute to the plot beyond being their identity marker, if they get to contribute to the plot at all, it’s still tokenism. It’s really about the depth and complexity that a character is allowed to bring with them beyond whatever identity markers they might carry.”

“Proper research into our characters’ cultural, historical and political backgrounds will go a long way in creating more well-rounded characters with a developed background.”

“Even if you only have one character from a particular minority community in your work, allowing them space to be their own person beyond their identity markers will go a long way in making sure they don’t become tokens and in showing the diversity that exists within each and every community.”

And here are the (re)sources we mentioned on the show:

Please note that this is not the original video of Rachel Rostad performing the slam poem. At the time of uploading this episode, it was no longer available on YouTube.

This week’s bonus material can be found here: https://representationmatters.art/2021/11/11/episode7

To be the first to know when our next episode drops, subscribe to our newsletter here: https://landing.mailerlite.com/webforms/landing/r3p6g8

As always, we’d love for you to join the conversation by filling out our questionnaires.

Our Doing Diversity in Writing – Writer Questionnaire can be filled in at https://forms.gle/UUEbeEvxsdwk1kuy5

Our Doing Diversity in Writing – Reader Questionnaire can be filled in at https://forms.gle/gTAg4qrvaCPtqVJ36

Don’t forget, you can find us at https://representationmatters.art/ and on https://www.facebook.com/doingdiversityinwriting

  continue reading

31 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide