Artwork

Content provided by Nina Andrijanic and Nina Andrijanic | EQ Leadership Coach. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Nina Andrijanic and Nina Andrijanic | EQ Leadership Coach or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

033 How can a politician be more socially responsible?

7:44
 
Share
 

Manage episode 154506507 series 1125299
Content provided by Nina Andrijanic and Nina Andrijanic | EQ Leadership Coach. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Nina Andrijanic and Nina Andrijanic | EQ Leadership Coach or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In this and the next episode we are looking closer into the role emotional intelligence plays in politics.

I am answering the most common 10 questions people are not asking us, but should and the question I am answering today is:

How can a politician be more socially responsible so that he/she can make an bigger impact in his/hers community by using strategies from EQ

Before I answer today’s question, I want to share today’s quote which is from Plato and it goes like this:

The first resistance to social change is to say it's not necessary.

Gloria Steinem

In my opinion social responsibility is linked to the structure of values and principles of a person, and this is what makes the person commit to his/her social mission as a political or public office.

A person in public office who does not commit to either the community (and even with the good of the whole world community) and not act and decide on the basis of the responsibility that has been granted by voters, is a person that it’s acting "stupid" as a politician, and therefore does not deserve this position because it is not able to give an adequate response to that responsibility.

When a politician gives signals to be making decisions from greed, from fear, from the ego or the need for power, it is time to dismiss him/her immediately because it’s for sure that the political will be making wrong decisions from inadequate emotional states and inadequate needs.

Stay tuned to find out more...

  continue reading

36 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 154506507 series 1125299
Content provided by Nina Andrijanic and Nina Andrijanic | EQ Leadership Coach. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Nina Andrijanic and Nina Andrijanic | EQ Leadership Coach or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

In this and the next episode we are looking closer into the role emotional intelligence plays in politics.

I am answering the most common 10 questions people are not asking us, but should and the question I am answering today is:

How can a politician be more socially responsible so that he/she can make an bigger impact in his/hers community by using strategies from EQ

Before I answer today’s question, I want to share today’s quote which is from Plato and it goes like this:

The first resistance to social change is to say it's not necessary.

Gloria Steinem

In my opinion social responsibility is linked to the structure of values and principles of a person, and this is what makes the person commit to his/her social mission as a political or public office.

A person in public office who does not commit to either the community (and even with the good of the whole world community) and not act and decide on the basis of the responsibility that has been granted by voters, is a person that it’s acting "stupid" as a politician, and therefore does not deserve this position because it is not able to give an adequate response to that responsibility.

When a politician gives signals to be making decisions from greed, from fear, from the ego or the need for power, it is time to dismiss him/her immediately because it’s for sure that the political will be making wrong decisions from inadequate emotional states and inadequate needs.

Stay tuned to find out more...

  continue reading

36 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide