))
Examining the Swiss Women's Victory in Landmark Climate Case
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now.
Last successful fetch was on May 18, 2024 13:01 (
What now? This series will be checked again in the next hour. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 411668651 series 3564935
Content provided by Eric Cochran. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Eric Cochran or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this episode, we into the controversial topic of climate change as a human rights issue following a groundbreaking climate ruling by the European Court of Human Rights.
The judgment accuses Switzerland of violating the human rights of more than 2,000 Swiss women by not adequately addressing climate change, drawing a wave of support from various environmental groups and potentially setting a precedent for similar lawsuits across Europe. However, Sasha and Eric question the appropriateness of international human rights courts as venues to handle the global issue of climate change.
The hosts scrutinize the use of courts like the ECHR to deliver what they believe to be "performative politics" rather than protecting fundamental human rights. They delve into potential ramifications of the tendency to frame climate change as a human rights issue, arguing the possibility of trivializing the concept of human rights.
While climate change is undeniably a serious challenge, Sasha and Eric suggest that the focus should be on people facing severe oppression, violence, and injustice. They express their worry that such court rulings may misdirect attention from truly oppressed victims to those claiming victim status due to climate-change-induced discomforts.
The episode unfolds further with a critical examination of Europe's efforts to combat climate change, with the hosts accusing the activist class of seeking perfection over progress and suggesting that such cases reveal more about this class rather than climate change itself.
An intense discussion follows, weighing the potential benefits and drawbacks of using legal pressure to force governments into climate action. The episode concludes with a powerful plea to maintain balance in the pursuit of drastic action against climate change, in a way that it does not trivialize the principles of justice and human rights.
Join Sasha and Eric on this intriguing episode of the Sandstorm podcast as they navigate the complex challenges and opportunities at the intersection of climate change, human rights, and legal accountability.
47 episodes
Share
