Artwork

Content provided by Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Will There Be A Karen Read Trial Part Two?

6:47
 
Share
 

Manage episode 426985762 series 3418589
Content provided by Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis discusses the hung jury in Karen Read's case and its implications. The prolonged deliberation, which lasted over six days, suggested either a defense verdict or a mistrial. Faddis explains that a mistrial is a significant challenge for prosecutors, as it forces them to decide whether to retry the case, negotiate a plea, or drop the charges altogether. He highlights the jury's inability to agree on even lesser charges, suggesting reasonable doubt influenced the decision. Faddis notes the prosecution's potential overconfidence and the possibility that they didn't address key issues effectively. He speculates that the prosecution might consider juror feedback on their split to decide whether to pursue another trial. Faddis also discusses the strategic considerations behind deciding whether to retry a case, emphasizing the need for strong evidence and effective witness preparation. The upcoming status conference on July 22nd will likely determine the next steps, including the possibility of a plea deal for Karen Read to avoid another lengthy trial. The conversation underscores the complexities and uncertainties inherent in the legal process, especially in cases with a hung jury and reasonable doubt.
### Main Points
- The Karen Read case resulted in a hung jury after over six days of deliberation.
- Faddis explains the difficulties and dissatisfaction for prosecutors dealing with mistrials.
- The Commonwealth must decide whether to retry the case, negotiate a plea, or dismiss the charges.
- The jury's inability to agree on lesser charges indicates significant reasonable doubt.
- Prosecution's potential overconfidence and failure to address key issues may have contributed to the mistrial.
- Juror feedback on their deliberation split could influence the decision to retry the case.
- Effective witness preparation and addressing key issues are crucial for a successful prosecution.
- The upcoming status conference on July 22nd will determine the next steps, including the possibility of a plea deal for Karen Read.
### Hashtags
#HiddenKillersWithTonyBrueski #EricFaddis #KarenRead #HungJury #ProsecutionChallenges #LegalProcess #ReasonableDoubt
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
  continue reading

6208 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 426985762 series 3418589
Content provided by Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary and True Crime Today. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary and True Crime Today or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In this episode of "Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski," former Felony Prosecutor and attorney Eric Faddis discusses the hung jury in Karen Read's case and its implications. The prolonged deliberation, which lasted over six days, suggested either a defense verdict or a mistrial. Faddis explains that a mistrial is a significant challenge for prosecutors, as it forces them to decide whether to retry the case, negotiate a plea, or drop the charges altogether. He highlights the jury's inability to agree on even lesser charges, suggesting reasonable doubt influenced the decision. Faddis notes the prosecution's potential overconfidence and the possibility that they didn't address key issues effectively. He speculates that the prosecution might consider juror feedback on their split to decide whether to pursue another trial. Faddis also discusses the strategic considerations behind deciding whether to retry a case, emphasizing the need for strong evidence and effective witness preparation. The upcoming status conference on July 22nd will likely determine the next steps, including the possibility of a plea deal for Karen Read to avoid another lengthy trial. The conversation underscores the complexities and uncertainties inherent in the legal process, especially in cases with a hung jury and reasonable doubt.
### Main Points
- The Karen Read case resulted in a hung jury after over six days of deliberation.
- Faddis explains the difficulties and dissatisfaction for prosecutors dealing with mistrials.
- The Commonwealth must decide whether to retry the case, negotiate a plea, or dismiss the charges.
- The jury's inability to agree on lesser charges indicates significant reasonable doubt.
- Prosecution's potential overconfidence and failure to address key issues may have contributed to the mistrial.
- Juror feedback on their deliberation split could influence the decision to retry the case.
- Effective witness preparation and addressing key issues are crucial for a successful prosecution.
- The upcoming status conference on July 22nd will determine the next steps, including the possibility of a plea deal for Karen Read.
### Hashtags
#HiddenKillersWithTonyBrueski #EricFaddis #KarenRead #HungJury #ProsecutionChallenges #LegalProcess #ReasonableDoubt
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
  continue reading

6208 episodes

Todos los episodios

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide