))
Maryland Shall Issue v. Moore and Firearm Purchaser Licensing
Manage episode 422873169 series 3579155
Content provided by Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, Kelly Roskam, Tim Carey, and Kari Still. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, Kelly Roskam, Tim Carey, and Kari Still or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In the inaugural episode of "Sufficiently Analogous," the team and their guests take a deep dive into the case of Maryland Shall Issue v. Moore—a case that could shape the future of Firearm Purchaser Licensing laws across the country. Last year, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit found Maryland’s Handgun Qualification License (HQL) unconstitutional. An HQL is a form of Firearm Purchaser Licensing that requires would-be handgun purchasers to apply for and receive a license. The two-judge majority ruling stated that the HQL, while not a permanent ban, violated the Second Amendment because it prevented individuals from immediately obtaining a handgun.
###
Timestamps
0:00 - Introduction
2:30 - Recap of Bruen Framework
4:38 - What is Firearm Purchaser Licensing?
7:35 - Cass Crifasi, PhD, MPH, co-director of the Center for Gun Violence Solutions discusses HQL & Firearm Purchaser Licensing
21:23 - Case History of MSI v. Moore
30:22 - Professor Saul Cornell, Paul and Diane Guenther Chair in American History at Fordham University discusses historic analogies and the Bruen test
45:50 - MSI v. Moore Oral Arguments and Predictions
3 episodes
Share
