))
U.S. v Rahimi: Firearms and Domestic Violence Protective Orders
Manage episode 423247685 series 3579155
Content provided by Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, Kelly Roskam, Tim Carey, and Kari Still. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, Kelly Roskam, Tim Carey, and Kari Still or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Hosts Kelly Roskam, JD, and Tim Carey, JD discuss U.S. v Rahimi. The upcoming decision from the Supreme Court could decide if those subject to a domestic violence protective order can possess firearms, as well as clarify how courts are supposed to handle Second Amendment cases in a Post-Bruen era.
###
0:00 - Introduction
1:03 - Domestic violence protective orders background
4:35 - April Zeoli, PhD, MPH policy core director of the Institute for Firearm Injury Prevention at the University of Michigan discusses intimate partner violence and evidence on the efficacy of domestic violence protective orders in preventing both domestic and mass violence
18:33 Overview of previous challenges to protective order firearm prohibitions
23:40 - Case history of U.S. v Rahimi at the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
42:30 – Supreme Court oral arguments in U.S. v Rahimi
58:13 – Outcome predictions
3 episodes
Share
