The 1st Amendment and Lawyer Communications

Summarily - A Podcast for Busy Lawyers

The Supreme Court of Florida recently issued an opinion about professionalism standards and stated, "The revised Professionalism Expectations that we adopt today emphasize that Florida’s professionalism standards apply to all forms of communication, including online communication, and to both in-person and remote (video or audio) interactions with others."
Zach Greenberg of FIRE (The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) joined me to discuss the opinion and whether the revisions presents First Amendment issues. Zach is also the plaintiff in Greenberg v. Haggerty, a First Amendment challenge to a Pennsylvania Bar Association's rule that restricts the free speech rights of Pennsylvania lawyers.
Thank you for listening. Please share the podcast with your friends and colleagues. Send your questions, comments, and feedback to [e-mail].
Summarily is supported by The Law Office of Scott N. Richardson, P.A.
Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services. The information provided on this podcast is not intended to be legal advice. You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice. If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer. The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast’s advertisers. This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only. Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast’s creator is prohibited.