Artwork

Content provided by Catherine Carr and David Runciman. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Catherine Carr and David Runciman or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Talking Politics Guide to ... Deliberative Democracy

22:43
 
Share
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on August 03, 2025 11:09 (3M ago). Last successful fetch was on December 12, 2024 15:11 (11M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 224372415 series 1423621
Content provided by Catherine Carr and David Runciman. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Catherine Carr and David Runciman or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

David talks to Matthew Taylor about whether more deliberation could remedy some of the defects in contemporary democracy. What can deliberative democracy add to traditional forms of political representation and how might it actually work in practice?


Talking Points:


The key feature of deliberative democracy is the idea that in order to fully tap into citizens’ views of an issue, you need to give them the time, information, and range of opinion to make an informed choice.

  • The deliberative group should be a mini-public—it’s the same principle as a jury.
  • Deliberative democracy allows you to see the process as well as the outcome. Many citizens change their minds.
  • Deliberation can legitimize representative democracy and make it possible for politicians to take difficult decisions.
  • But there are drawbacks too: it takes a lot of time and it can lead to polarization.

Deliberation leads to more long term thinking and creates a sense of shared responsibility between citizens and the government.

  • Some people are suspicious that deliberative democracy is simply an attempt to get progressive politics in by another route.
  • So much of contemporary politics is about crowds, charisma, and slogans. Deliberative democracy is slow and informed.

There should have been some kind of deliberative process before Brexit.

  • There was a deliberative process before the Irish referendum, which made something that could have been incredibly divisive into a positive.
  • But it might be too late for Brexit. Politicizing deliberative democracy could undermine it.
  • Deliberative democracy needs to be a habit in order to work properly.

Deliberative democracy is a form of democracy that is attractive and uplifting.

  • It could be an antidote to the ugliness of contemporary politics.
  • Deliberation is a gateway reform: if you make it a habit, you can use deliberative methodologies to explore other kinds of democratic reforms.
  • The main barrier is ignorance, not hostility. Once people understand what deliberative democracy is, they tend to be interested.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Further Learning:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking


Set your alarms… for Sunday, when David talks to Helen about the economic order that was created in the aftermath of the Second World War. What was agreed at Bretton Woods, how did it work, why did it eventually fail, and can any of it be revived?

  continue reading

382 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on August 03, 2025 11:09 (3M ago). Last successful fetch was on December 12, 2024 15:11 (11M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 224372415 series 1423621
Content provided by Catherine Carr and David Runciman. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Catherine Carr and David Runciman or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

David talks to Matthew Taylor about whether more deliberation could remedy some of the defects in contemporary democracy. What can deliberative democracy add to traditional forms of political representation and how might it actually work in practice?


Talking Points:


The key feature of deliberative democracy is the idea that in order to fully tap into citizens’ views of an issue, you need to give them the time, information, and range of opinion to make an informed choice.

  • The deliberative group should be a mini-public—it’s the same principle as a jury.
  • Deliberative democracy allows you to see the process as well as the outcome. Many citizens change their minds.
  • Deliberation can legitimize representative democracy and make it possible for politicians to take difficult decisions.
  • But there are drawbacks too: it takes a lot of time and it can lead to polarization.

Deliberation leads to more long term thinking and creates a sense of shared responsibility between citizens and the government.

  • Some people are suspicious that deliberative democracy is simply an attempt to get progressive politics in by another route.
  • So much of contemporary politics is about crowds, charisma, and slogans. Deliberative democracy is slow and informed.

There should have been some kind of deliberative process before Brexit.

  • There was a deliberative process before the Irish referendum, which made something that could have been incredibly divisive into a positive.
  • But it might be too late for Brexit. Politicizing deliberative democracy could undermine it.
  • Deliberative democracy needs to be a habit in order to work properly.

Deliberative democracy is a form of democracy that is attractive and uplifting.

  • It could be an antidote to the ugliness of contemporary politics.
  • Deliberation is a gateway reform: if you make it a habit, you can use deliberative methodologies to explore other kinds of democratic reforms.
  • The main barrier is ignorance, not hostility. Once people understand what deliberative democracy is, they tend to be interested.

Mentioned in this Episode:

Further Learning:

And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking


Set your alarms… for Sunday, when David talks to Helen about the economic order that was created in the aftermath of the Second World War. What was agreed at Bretton Woods, how did it work, why did it eventually fail, and can any of it be revived?

  continue reading

382 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play