Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
14 subscribers
Checked 40m ago
Added three years ago
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Podcasts Worth a Listen
SPONSORED
H
How to Be a Better Human


1 Throwing good parties and building community (w/ Priya Parker) 38:16
38:16
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked38:16
Many of us are entering the new year with a similar goal — to build community and connect more with others. To kick off season five, Priya Parker shares ideas on how to be the host with the most. An expert on building connection, Priya is the author of “The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters.” Whether it's a book club, wedding, birthday or niche-and-obscurely themed party, Priya and Chris talk about how to create meaningful and fun experiences for all of your guests — including yourself. For the full text transcript, visit go.ted.com/BHTranscripts . For the full text transcript, visit go.ted.com/BHTranscripts Want to help shape TED’s shows going forward? Fill out our survey here ! Learn more about TED Next at ted.com/futureyou Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.…
Ghislaine Maxwell Petitions The Supreme Court (Part 2) (4/14/25)
Manage episode 476981082 series 3380507
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
The document titled "Maxwell Petition" is a legal filing submitted by Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team, seeking a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court. In this petition, Maxwell challenges the decisions of the lower courts regarding her conviction and sentencing related to charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy. Her attorneys argue that the trial court made significant errors, including issues related to jury selection, evidentiary rulings, and the interpretation of federal statutes under which she was convicted. They contend that these alleged errors infringed upon Maxwell's constitutional rights, warranting a review by the Supreme Court.
Furthermore, the petition emphasizes the broader implications of the case, suggesting that the lower courts' decisions set concerning precedents that could affect future defendants' rights and the interpretation of federal criminal statutes. Maxwell's legal team asserts that the Supreme Court's intervention is necessary to address these pivotal legal questions and to ensure uniformity in the application of federal law. They request that the Court grant the writ to rectify what they perceive as miscarriages of justice in Maxwell's trial and to provide clarity on the legal standards applied.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
maxwell-petition.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
Furthermore, the petition emphasizes the broader implications of the case, suggesting that the lower courts' decisions set concerning precedents that could affect future defendants' rights and the interpretation of federal criminal statutes. Maxwell's legal team asserts that the Supreme Court's intervention is necessary to address these pivotal legal questions and to ensure uniformity in the application of federal law. They request that the Court grant the writ to rectify what they perceive as miscarriages of justice in Maxwell's trial and to provide clarity on the legal standards applied.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
maxwell-petition.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1041 episodes
Manage episode 476981082 series 3380507
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
The document titled "Maxwell Petition" is a legal filing submitted by Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team, seeking a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court. In this petition, Maxwell challenges the decisions of the lower courts regarding her conviction and sentencing related to charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy. Her attorneys argue that the trial court made significant errors, including issues related to jury selection, evidentiary rulings, and the interpretation of federal statutes under which she was convicted. They contend that these alleged errors infringed upon Maxwell's constitutional rights, warranting a review by the Supreme Court.
Furthermore, the petition emphasizes the broader implications of the case, suggesting that the lower courts' decisions set concerning precedents that could affect future defendants' rights and the interpretation of federal criminal statutes. Maxwell's legal team asserts that the Supreme Court's intervention is necessary to address these pivotal legal questions and to ensure uniformity in the application of federal law. They request that the Court grant the writ to rectify what they perceive as miscarriages of justice in Maxwell's trial and to provide clarity on the legal standards applied.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
maxwell-petition.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
Furthermore, the petition emphasizes the broader implications of the case, suggesting that the lower courts' decisions set concerning precedents that could affect future defendants' rights and the interpretation of federal criminal statutes. Maxwell's legal team asserts that the Supreme Court's intervention is necessary to address these pivotal legal questions and to ensure uniformity in the application of federal law. They request that the Court grant the writ to rectify what they perceive as miscarriages of justice in Maxwell's trial and to provide clarity on the legal standards applied.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
maxwell-petition.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1041 episodes
All episodes
×T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Diddy Trial: Special Agent DeLeassa Penland Takes The Stand Before Lunch On Day 25 (6/17/25) 23:50
23:50
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked23:50
Before lunch on June 17th, the Sean “Diddy” Combs federal trial resumed with a tense start as Judge Arun Subramanian sternly warned both legal teams about the leaking of information from a previously sealed Friday hearing. He emphasized that any further violations of gag or sealing orders could result in civil or criminal contempt charges, holding lead counsel personally accountable for compliance going forward. The judge’s remarks set the tone for a morning already thick with tension, as the courtroom braced for more disturbing and explicit government evidence. The prosecution continued its case by recalling FBI Special Agent DeLeassa Penland to the stand, who walked jurors through a collection of phone records and text messages between Combs and his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. These messages, sent both before and after the alleged 2016 hotel assault, were framed as evidence of Combs’s desperation, control, and attempts to manage public fallout. Penland also introduced sexually explicit video footage, referred to as “freak-off” recordings, which showed Combs orchestrating group sex parties. Several jurors—particularly Black female jurors—were visibly unsettled during the viewing, reacting with discomfort and concern. The prosecution supplemented the footage with related evidence, including records of luxury purchases like candles and flights allegedly used to support these events, as well as documentation of hotel damages totaling tens of thousands of dollars. Finally, the government previewed the upcoming testimony of Brendan Paul, a former Syracuse University basketball player turned Combs assistant, who is expected to testify under immunity. Meanwhile, the defense signaled that its case would be brief—potentially only two days—strongly suggesting that Combs himself will not take the stand. This development sets up the possibility that jury deliberations could begin as soon as next week. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial coverage | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 The Feds Blast Diddy's Legal Team Over Their 'Inappropriate Behavior' (6/17/25) 10:01
10:01
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked10:01
In this letter addressed to Judge Subramanian, the Government responds to the defense's renewed objections to the removal of Juror #6 in the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs. The prosecution firmly denies the defense’s repeated claims that its efforts to remove the juror were racially motivated, calling the accusation “baseless.” It emphasizes that the juror was dismissed due to multiple inconsistencies in his statements during voir dire and subsequent questioning—specifically regarding basic biographical details like his residence. The Government asserts that it merely flagged the issue of candor to the Court, which independently concluded removal was warranted after its own review of the record. The Government further notes that nothing in the defense’s latest letter undermines the Court’s rationale for the juror’s dismissal. While stating it does not oppose further inquiry into a separate juror mentioned in the defense letter, the Government criticizes the rest of the submission as a barrage of unfounded personal attacks on the prosecution team. It asks the Court to both disregard and formally rebuke those portions of the defense’s letter as inappropriate and irrelevant to the matter at hand. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.405.0_2.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 What Happened to Juror #6? Inside the Diddy Courtroom Bombshell (6/17/25) 12:10
12:10
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:10
Juror #6—a 41‑year‑old Black man—was dismissed on June 16, 2025, by Judge Arun Subramanian after it emerged that he had provided conflicting information about his residence. During jury selection, he stated he lived in the Bronx, but later told court staff he had moved to New Jersey—making him potentially ineligible for the Manhattan federal jury. The judge cited serious concerns over his candor and credibility, noting that these inconsistencies might suggest he “shaded answers to get on, and stay on” the jury. Combs’s defense objected to the removal, arguing that dismissing one of only two Black men on the panel—and replacing him with a white male alternate—would compromise racial diversity and prejudice Combs. But Judge Subramanian emphasized that the decision was based solely on honesty and eligibility, stating that allowing the juror to remain “would be improper” if race were the motive. He noted the need to uphold the integrity of the process and maintain trust in juror credibility. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Diddy trial faces jury issues as experts question no sequestration | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Diddy Trial: Special Agent DeLeassa Penland's Is Back On The Stand After Lunch On Day 24 (Part 3) (6/17/25) 12:25
12:25
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:25
After the lunch break on Monday, June 16, 2025, testimony resumed with U.S. Special Agent DeLeassa Penland, who continued detailing travel records and communications tied to alleged “freak‑off” encounters. Specifically, she walked the jury through flight itineraries showing that a male escort—identified as Jules Theodore—flew from Los Angeles to New York in December 2009. These arrangements were allegedly made by Sean Combs and paid for using his American Express card registered to Bad Boy Entertainment. The jury also heard text messages between Combs and Jules coordinating the travel and stay at the London Hotel, underlining the prosecution’s argument about the orchestration of these encounters. Following that, the focus shifted to financial documentation: the prosecution introduced credit card statements and travel logs tying Combs’s business entity to payments for escorts and hotel bookings. These materials were presented to support the trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges—showing evidence of Combs arranging and funding travel and accommodations for escorts. Court then adjourned for the day, with the testimony set to continue the next day to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: June 16, 2025 - Day 24 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Diddy Requests a Stay In The Lawsuit Filed Against Him By Thalia Graves (6/17/25) 10:03
10:03
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked10:03
In the case Graves v. Combs et al., 24-cv-07201, attorneys for Sean Combs—joined by co-defendant Joseph Sherman—have submitted a formal request to Judge Torres seeking a stay of the proceedings. The defendants argue that two pending appeals currently before the Second Circuit—Parker v. Alexander (No. 25-487) and Doe v. Black (No. 25-564)—will be determinative of the central legal issues raised in their motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 52-57). They maintain that the outcomes of these appellate cases are likely to directly impact the viability of the claims brought against them. The defense is asking that this matter be paused until thirty days after the Second Circuit renders decisions in both cited appeals. They note that such a stay would be consistent with the approach taken by the Court in a related matter, English v. Combs et al., 24 Civ. 05090, where Judge Torres granted a similar stay pending resolution of the same appellate questions. The request is presented as a measure of judicial efficiency and fairness, with the goal of avoiding potentially unnecessary litigation should the Second Circuit rulings render some or all of the current claims invalid. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628776.67.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And The Amended Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy (Part 11-12) (6/17/25) 25:16
25:16
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked25:16
Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV’s Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection. The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs’s legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Sara cmplt Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Mega Edition: Sara Rivers And The Amended Lawsuit Filed Against Diddy (Part 9-10) (6/16/25) 23:11
23:11
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked23:11
Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV’s Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection. The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs’s legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Sara cmplt Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Ashton Kutcher And The Diddy Parties He Refuses to Discuss 11:24
11:24
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:24
Ashton Kutcher has a long-standing friendship with Sean "Diddy" Combs, which has recently come under scrutiny. In a resurfaced 2019 interview on Hot Ones, Kutcher awkwardly dodged questions about what went on at Diddy’s infamous "White Parties," where many celebrities gathered. When asked for details, Kutcher laughed it off, saying, "I’ve got a lot I can’t tell," and added that he was "cycling through" memories but refrained from sharing specifics. This refusal to discuss the parties, paired with his cryptic remarks, has sparked renewed interest following Diddy's recent legal troubles. Kutcher described their relationship as "bizarre," explaining that it started when Diddy became a fan of Punk’d. Over time, they became friends, hanging out regularly, including attending parties and even running the New York Marathon together. Despite the public's curiosity about what happened at these parties, Kutcher has remained silent on specifics, emphasizing that he won't reveal any of the more scandalous details. (commercial at 7:24) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Ashton Kutcher refuses to discuss Sean 'Diddy' Combs' parties in resurfaced interview (pagesix.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Diddy And The Limp Wristed Apology In the Wake Of The Cassie Video Dropping 15:01
15:01
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked15:01
Whenever one of these famous people finds themselves in hot water, their go to narrative is something like this: "I've realized that I have done some things that are bad, but now I'm getting help. I've found God and I'm in therapy." Diddy is no exception. In his latest attempt to try and change the narrative, he released a ridiculous apology video where he does everything but apologize to his victims. In this episode, we take a look at that apology and at the story overall and see where things currently stand now that the video has hit the public sphere. (commercial at 10:34) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs apologizes in a statement for assaulting Cassie Ventura | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

A forthcoming Peacock documentary titled "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy" delves into serious allegations against music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs, currently incarcerated on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. The 90-minute film, premiering January 14, features interviews with individuals from Combs' inner circle—such as former bodyguards, childhood friends, and associates—who provide disturbing accounts of his alleged misconduct. One anonymous source claims that rooms illuminated in red signified sexual activities, often involving underage girls. Additionally, testimonies suggest that women were coerced or threatened into participating in these encounters. Combs' legal troubles have intensified since his arrest on September 16, 2024. He faces multiple civil lawsuits alleging sexual assault, with some plaintiffs accusing him of drugging and assaulting them. His legal team has vehemently denied these accusations, labeling them as false and defamatory. The documentary aims to shed light on these serious allegations, challenging viewers to reconsider their perceptions of the influential music figure. (commercial at 8:16) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Diddy responds to upcoming Peacock documentary featuring members of his inner circle | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Former Pussycat Doll Kaya Jones Dishes On The Diddy Arrest 12:01
12:01
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked12:01
Kaya Jones, a former member of the Pussycat Dolls, has made several claims regarding Sean "Diddy" Combs and his associates: Pressure to Engage in Sexual Activities: Jones has shared that during her time with the Pussycat Dolls, she felt pressured to engage in sexual relationships with powerful figures in the music industry, including those linked to Combs. Abuse by Combs' Inner Circle: In interviews, she recounted uncomfortable encounters with individuals connected to Combs, suggesting that the environment around him was part of a larger pattern of industry misconduct. Industry-Wide Exploitation: Jones has emphasized that the issues surrounding Combs reflect a broader culture of abuse in the entertainment world. She believes that the recent lawsuits against Combs could lead to meaningful change and accountability in the industry. Her comments add to the ongoing conversation about Combs' alleged misconduct and underscore the systemic nature of exploitation within the music business. In this episode, we take a look at what she had to say. (commercial at 7:35) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Pussycat Dolls star Kaya Jones says the powerful men on Diddy list are the same 'suits' who abused her | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Diddy Trial: The Feds Call Two More Federal Agents To The Stand Before Lunch On Day 24 (Part 2) (6/17/25) 15:53
15:53
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked15:53
In the morning session, Judge Arun Subramanian formally dismissed Juror No. 6—a 41-year-old Black man—due to “lack of candor” after he gave conflicting statements about living in the Bronx versus New Jersey, which raised concerns about his eligibility for juror service in the Southern District of New York. Combs’s defense argued that this dismissal reduced the diversity of the panel and was racially motivated, filing a letter and threatening to seek a mistrial if the removal wasn't reversed. Judge Subramanian denied both requests, stating that the decision was based strictly on the juror's factual inconsistencies, not race, and quickly seated a White accountant from Westchester County as a replacement After the jury reassembled, prosecutors called Ananya Sankar, a paralegal specialist from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, as a summary witness. Before lunch, Sankar began presenting and walking jurors through a collection of text messages and call logs—including communications between Combs, his staff (like chief of staff Kristina Khorram), and his ex-girlfriend “Jane”. These messages covered topics such as organizing “Wild King Nights,” procurement of MDMA (“Molly”), and discussions of explicit encounters—part of the prosecution’s efforts to organize the voluminous digital evidence ahead of closing the case this week. The second witness to take the stand before lunch on June 16, 2025, was Special Agent DeLeassa Penland from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York. She served as another "summary witness," dispatched to help organize and present the vast trove of digital evidence to the jury. Penland walked jurors through charts and data, including additional phone and text message logs—this time highlighting communications between Combs, his bodyguard “D‑Roc,” and former assistant “Mia.” to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ trial coverage | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 Diddy Trial: The Feds Call Two More Federal Agents To The Stand Before Lunch On Day 24 (Part 1) (6/16/25) 19:16
19:16
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked19:16
In the morning session, Judge Arun Subramanian formally dismissed Juror No. 6—a 41-year-old Black man—due to “lack of candor” after he gave conflicting statements about living in the Bronx versus New Jersey, which raised concerns about his eligibility for juror service in the Southern District of New York. Combs’s defense argued that this dismissal reduced the diversity of the panel and was racially motivated, filing a letter and threatening to seek a mistrial if the removal wasn't reversed. Judge Subramanian denied both requests, stating that the decision was based strictly on the juror's factual inconsistencies, not race, and quickly seated a White accountant from Westchester County as a replacement After the jury reassembled, prosecutors called Ananya Sankar, a paralegal specialist from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, as a summary witness. Before lunch, Sankar began presenting and walking jurors through a collection of text messages and call logs—including communications between Combs, his staff (like chief of staff Kristina Khorram), and his ex-girlfriend “Jane”. These messages covered topics such as organizing “Wild King Nights,” procurement of MDMA (“Molly”), and discussions of explicit encounters—part of the prosecution’s efforts to organize the voluminous digital evidence ahead of closing the case this week. The second witness to take the stand before lunch on June 16, 2025, was Special Agent DeLeassa Penland from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York. She served as another "summary witness," dispatched to help organize and present the vast trove of digital evidence to the jury. Penland walked jurors through charts and data, including additional phone and text message logs—this time highlighting communications between Combs, his bodyguard “D‑Roc,” and former assistant “Mia.” to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ trial coverage | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 The War Between Diddy's Legal Team And The Prosecution Over Juror # 6 Heats Up (Part 3) (6/16/25) 9:09
9:09
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked9:09
In United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), the defense objects to the government's motion to strike a juror, arguing that such an action would severely prejudice Mr. Combs. They contend that the juror’s perceived inconsistencies in answering the Court's questions are insufficient grounds for removal, citing Fazio as legal precedent that limits the Court's discretion in such matters. The defense maintains that there is no valid factual basis for the motion to dismiss the juror. Additionally, the defense challenges the government's claim that the motion is a good-faith effort to address the juror's integrity. They argue that this motion should be evaluated in the broader context of the case, given the history of the investigation and prosecution. The defense asserts that the government’s action is not a legitimate concern about the juror’s qualifications but rather an attempt to exploit an opportunity to remove a juror, potentially based on racial or strategic motives. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.404.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
T
The Epstein Chronicles

1 The War Between Diddy's Legal Team And The Prosecution Over Juror # 6 Heats Up (Part 2) (6/16/25) 11:39
11:39
Play Later
Play Later
Lists
Like
Liked11:39
In United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), the defense objects to the government's motion to strike a juror, arguing that such an action would severely prejudice Mr. Combs. They contend that the juror’s perceived inconsistencies in answering the Court's questions are insufficient grounds for removal, citing Fazio as legal precedent that limits the Court's discretion in such matters. The defense maintains that there is no valid factual basis for the motion to dismiss the juror. Additionally, the defense challenges the government's claim that the motion is a good-faith effort to address the juror's integrity. They argue that this motion should be evaluated in the broader context of the case, given the history of the investigation and prosecution. The defense asserts that the government’s action is not a legitimate concern about the juror’s qualifications but rather an attempt to exploit an opportunity to remove a juror, potentially based on racial or strategic motives. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.404.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support .…
Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.