Go offline with the Player FM app!
What's in a face?
Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)
When? This feed was archived on November 23, 2023 20:07 (). Last successful fetch was on November 12, 2022 18:09 ()
Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 157029553 series 1207705
We chat about the complex ways we perceive faces, how it can go wrong, and how this system plays a crucial role in how you gravitate towards one political candidate over another. Can we predict your political party based purely on the way you perceive faces? Can you predict a company's profitability based on the face of its CEO alone?
Literature Referenced:
1. Rossion B. Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jun;18(6):310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Apr 1. Review. PubMed PMID: 24703600.
2. Rossion B. Understanding face perception by means of prosopagnosia and neuroimaging. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2014 Jun 1;6:258-307. Review. PubMed PMID: 24896206.
3. Todorov A, Mandisodza AN, Goren A, Hall CC. Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1623-6. PubMed PMID: 15947187.
4. Rule NO, Ambady N. The face of success: inferences from chief executive officers' appearance predict company profits. Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02054.x. PubMed PMID: 18271856.
5. Rule NO, Ambady N, Adams RB Jr, Ozono H, Nakashima S, Yoshikawa S, Watabe M. Polling the face: prediction and consensus across cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0017673. PubMed PMID: 20053027.
6. Rule NO, Ambady N. Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 18;5(1):e8733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008733. PubMed PMID: 20090906; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2807452.
7. Hu SF, Chang CK, Chen YC, Chien SH. Taiwanese Political Parties can be Categorized by Face, by Those Who Reported Making Face-To-Trait Inferences. Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 11;6:1931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01931. eCollection 2015. PubMed PMID: 26793130; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4707650.
27 episodes
Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)
When? This feed was archived on November 23, 2023 20:07 (). Last successful fetch was on November 12, 2022 18:09 ()
Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 157029553 series 1207705
We chat about the complex ways we perceive faces, how it can go wrong, and how this system plays a crucial role in how you gravitate towards one political candidate over another. Can we predict your political party based purely on the way you perceive faces? Can you predict a company's profitability based on the face of its CEO alone?
Literature Referenced:
1. Rossion B. Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jun;18(6):310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Apr 1. Review. PubMed PMID: 24703600.
2. Rossion B. Understanding face perception by means of prosopagnosia and neuroimaging. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2014 Jun 1;6:258-307. Review. PubMed PMID: 24896206.
3. Todorov A, Mandisodza AN, Goren A, Hall CC. Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1623-6. PubMed PMID: 15947187.
4. Rule NO, Ambady N. The face of success: inferences from chief executive officers' appearance predict company profits. Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02054.x. PubMed PMID: 18271856.
5. Rule NO, Ambady N, Adams RB Jr, Ozono H, Nakashima S, Yoshikawa S, Watabe M. Polling the face: prediction and consensus across cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0017673. PubMed PMID: 20053027.
6. Rule NO, Ambady N. Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 18;5(1):e8733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008733. PubMed PMID: 20090906; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2807452.
7. Hu SF, Chang CK, Chen YC, Chien SH. Taiwanese Political Parties can be Categorized by Face, by Those Who Reported Making Face-To-Trait Inferences. Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 11;6:1931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01931. eCollection 2015. PubMed PMID: 26793130; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4707650.
27 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.