Only picked up 37 GIRLS' CONTACTS in 5 hours

MikeMehlman.net

Main blog - https://mikemehlman.net/

Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/mikemehlman

Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/mike_mehlman/

Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/mikemehlman.net

This short post covers two main points: 1) female non-receptiveness is the male non-approach (I've written a longer article on this topic before), and 2) you cannot achieve high contact acquisitions without incurring a greater number of rejections first. To address the first point: The same way most males won't approach females no matter what, most females will reject males no matter what. This isn't weird. This is normal and expected. Most of the time guys will simply just never approach. Likewise, most of the time girls will simply just not be receptive when you say hi. This default non-receptiveness by females is particularly apparent during high-volume approach sessions, where the male will observe how most females will deflect no matter what. It's not about who he is, what he says, or what he does - most women will decline an interaction regardless. This natural default setting in females mirrors the non-approach default setting in men. Most guys carry a fear around saying hi to women. They care about others' opinions and judgments so much that they're unable to introduce themselves to women they find attractive. On the surface, they may justify their non-forwardness by repeating trite societal talking points designed to shame, such as that approach is "creepy" or "harassment." In reality these are superficial and meaningless justifications and are merely rooted in fear held at a more visceral level. Most women's fear manifests reciprocally as the declination of male advancements. They too may justify on the surface that a guy approaching them in public is "creepy," but the default/gut response is rooted in fear. Cogent arguments can be made as far as the evolutionary basis for male non-approach and female non-receptiveness: males risked being killed in the caveman days before laws; females risked carrying offspring without securing provision. However both genders, by avoiding these risks, also have evolved to potentially miss out on procreation altogether as a result. Most men will go through life never realizing they could have unlocked countless more sexual opportunities; many women will remain childless despite staying "picky" even in their low-SMV 40s. I didn't mention it in this video, but it should also be noted that the same way it becomes increasingly difficult for a male to make an approach the longer he hesitates / contemplates it, females will become increasingly closed off the longer they themselves contemplate a male's approach. If you are at a cafe and a girl sits down at the table next to you, she's much more likely to be receptive if you open her the moment she sits down versus if you both sit there in silence for 30 minutes and she can feel out your awkwardness and hesitation. This means if you see a girl and/or she sees you, do everything you can to minimize any discontinuity and approach her as soon as you can. Think less. Act more. To address the second point: Don't expect to pick up 37 contacts in a day (or 68 contacts in a day) without taking 150 or 200+ rejections at the same time. Guys will fixate on lay count as well. This too holds true: you will not acquire the sexual outcomes you're looking for without...

Continue reading: https://mikemehlman.net/2020/12/23/a-another-post-for-men-looking-to-pick-up-more-contacts/