))
Episode 6: The (Lack of) “Better Care” Act and Threatening Cuts to Research Funding
Archived series ("HTTP Redirect" status)
Replaced by: www.diagnostocracy.com
When?
This feed was archived on July 08, 2017 18:11 (
Why? HTTP Redirect status. The feed permanently redirected to another series.
What now? If you were subscribed to this series when it was replaced, you will now be subscribed to the replacement series. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 181793690 series 1421686
Content provided by Diagnostocracy. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Diagnostocracy or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Senate GOP just dropped the highly anticipated “Better Care Reconciliation Act” (read our latest Health on the Hill post about it here). Keifer and Ti break it down [1:19] before talking with Martha Streng, PhD candidate in neuroscience at the University of Minnesota [27:46]. She discusses the threats of significant cuts to research funding under a Trump Administration and what effects it could have on the already shaky climate in academia, and sheds light on the dawn of a new era in neuroscience tech research.
Trump’s new budget proposal includes steep cuts to basic science research, and does not show any understanding of the relationship between basic and translational sciences. Martha argues that these cuts would be detrimental not only to advancing research on the treatment of disorders like schizophrenia, but to our comprehension of even the normal brain.
https://diagnostocracy.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/episode-6.m4a
Filed under: Podcast
7 episodes
Share
