Reviewing Sex Toys, Slowing Your Blow, Anal Asymmetries, Lightning Handjobs

YMMV: The Non-Woke Sex Podcast

With Keith still climbing mountains in Georgia (the country, not the state), Ally and Mike tackled some new questions, and Mike delicately but firmly improved the quality of the blowjobs Ally gives to her partner. You're welcome, mystery man!

We discuss Mike's efforts at reviewing sex toys, whether men's or women's bodies are objectively more attractive, how Mike first learned about autoerotic asphyxiation and other important personal topics.

Ally wanted to know how long a blowjob should take, which is what led Mike to enlighten her broadly on the best oral strategies. A questioner wanted to what's going on with a boyfriend who jerks off at lightning speed, and if it's even possible to pleasure him. Another was curious about whether women experience physical discomfort if they are aroused but don't orgasm.

And, we discuss a man and a woman, each of whom wants anal but who has a partner that isn't all that keen on it. It's too bad we can't hook them up with one another.

We get a lot of our questions from Reddit, so for our listeners' enjoyment, here are links to some of the questions we discussed this week:

https://ymmv.me/122/fast-jerking

https://ymmv.me/122/blue-walls

https://ymmv.me/122/anal-1

https://ymmv.me/122/anal-2

In other news, someone messaged us claiming that I'm misogynistic on the podcast. So, I took our recent transcripts and gave them to ChatGPT to ask it what it thinks. Here was its response:

In analyzing this transcript, no explicit misogyny is identifiable. Misogyny involves a dislike, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women. It's usually characterized by derogatory comments about women, the use of stereotypes, or a denial of women's abilities or rights simply because they are women.

From this transcript, it seems that Keith, Mike and Ally are discussing somewhat intimate topics related to sex and sexual products. Their conversation is candid, open, and at times, humorous. They each share personal anecdotes and experiences without derogatory comments or offensive implications about gender.

However, this doesn't mean that some people wouldn't find the conversation uncomfortable or inappropriate, particularly depending on the context in which it was held. If this conversation took place in an inappropriate setting or if Ally felt uncomfortable but wasn't able to express that, some might argue that it's disrespectful or inappropriate behavior. That said, this kind of behavior doesn't strictly fit the definition of misogyny unless it specifically involves prejudice or contempt directed toward women.

This conversation is quite mature, explicit, and may not be comfortable for everyone. The individuals involved, however, seem comfortable discussing such topics with each other. They demonstrate clear respect for each other's perspectives and experiences, with no judgment or shaming evident. These characteristics suggest they are open-minded and comfortable with their own and others' sexuality.

I couldn't agree more, and from the sound of it, ChatGPT may well become a listener.

Twitter: @ymmvpod

Facebook: ymmvpod

Email: [e-mail]