))
Ep. 27 - The Abortion Debate, Part 1: Can the Pro-Choice Stance Hold Up Against Biblical and Logical Scrutiny?
Manage episode 442972647 series 3553139
Content provided by Sam Landa and Tim Yonts, Sam Landa, and Tim Yonts. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Sam Landa and Tim Yonts, Sam Landa, and Tim Yonts or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Can the Pro-Choice stance withstand the logical scrutiny of the SLED test? Join us for a thought-provoking journey as we dissect the controversial topic of abortion, particularly focusing on the divergence of opinions among Christians and nonbelievers. In this episode, we tackle the crucial distinction between biological life and personhood, examining the debate on whether personhood begins at conception. Our discussion is grounded in a thorough analysis of biblical passages and aims to bring clarity to this sensitive issue with a commitment to truth and grace.
We explore the biblical perspective on the value and personhood of the unborn through key scriptures from both the Old and New Testaments. We delve into the Mosaic Law in Exodus 21 and the New Testament narratives of Jesus and John the Baptist, illustrating how the Bible consistently portrays unborn life as valuable and imbued with personhood from conception. Furthermore, we address common objections raised by pro-choice advocates, emphasizing the difference between accidental harm leading to miscarriage and intentional termination of pregnancy. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biblical stance on this issue.
Shifting gears, we present effective pro-life arguments that don't rely on scripture for those engaging with non-Christian audiences. Using the SLED test, we highlight the logical inconsistencies in the pro-choice stance and affirm the personhood of the unborn. We also examine Judith Jarvis Thomson's famous analogy and the moral responsibilities in the abortion debate through a "quadra lemma" framework. Finally, we offer practical strategies for discussing abortion with confidence and respect, equipping you to navigate these challenging conversations thoughtfully. Don't miss out on gaining the tools for a more informed and compassionate dialogue on this contentious topic.
FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM:
@psych_and_theo
Psych and Theo Link
FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK:
Psych and Theo Link
Please leave a review, send comments and questions, and share the podcast with everyone you know. We love having these conversations with you all and are thankful for your support!
I look forward to walking alongside you as you draw closer to Christ!
Chapters
1. Ep. 27 - The Abortion Debate, Part 1: Can the Pro-Choice Stance Hold Up Against Biblical and Logical Scrutiny? (00:00:00)
2. Biblical vs. Pro-Choice Arguments (00:00:03)
3. Unborn Personhood in Religious Texts (00:13:06)
4. Biblical Passages on Abortion (00:20:03)
5. Pro-Life Arguments Without Scripture (00:34:01)
6. Moral Responsibility in Abortion Debate (00:41:23)
7. Moral Obligations in Pregnancy Debate (00:50:03)
8. Effective Abortion Debate Strategies (00:55:59)
38 episodes
Share
