PT Inquest is an online journal club. Hosted by Jason Tuori, Megan Graham, and Chris Juneau, the show looks at an article every week and discusses how it applies to current physical therapy practice.
…
continue reading
Content provided by Danny Lennon. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Danny Lennon or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
#531: Correlation, Causation & Cliché
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 432754005 series 2461191
Content provided by Danny Lennon. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Danny Lennon or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In the realm of nutrition science and health, understanding the intricate relationship between various factors and health outcomes is crucial yet challenging. How do we determine whether a specific nutrient genuinely impacts our health, or if the observed effects are merely coincidental? This intriguing question brings us to the core concepts of correlation and causation. You’ve likely heard the adage “correlation is not causation,” but what does this truly mean in the context of scientific research and public health recommendations? Can a strong association between two variables ever imply a causal relationship, or is it always just a statistical coincidence? These questions are not merely academic; they are pivotal in shaping the guidelines that influence our daily lives. For instance, when studies reveal a link between high sodium intake and hypertension, how do scientists distinguish between a mere correlation and a true causal relationship? Similarly, the debate around LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease hinges on understanding whether high cholesterol levels directly cause heart disease, or if other confounding factors are at play. Unraveling these complexities requires a deep dive into the standards of proof and the different models used to assess causality in scientific research. As we delve into these topics, we’ll explore how public health recommendations are formed despite the inherent challenges in proving causality. What methods do scientists use to ensure that their findings are robust and reliable? How do they account for the myriad of confounding variables that can skew results? By understanding the nuances of these processes, we can better appreciate the rigorous scientific effort that underpins dietary guidelines and health advisories. Join us on this exploration of correlation, causation, and the standards of proof in nutrition science. Through real-world examples and critical discussions, we will illuminate the pathways from observational studies to actionable health recommendations. Are you ready to uncover the mechanisms that bridge the gap between scientific evidence and practical health advice? Let’s dive in and discover the fascinating dynamics at play. Timestamps:
…
continue reading
- 01:32 Understanding Correlation and Causation
- 03:54 Historical Perspectives on Causality
- 06:33 Causal Models in Health Sciences
- 14:53 Probabilistic vs. Deterministic Causation
- 30:52 Standards of Proof in Public Health
- 36:44 Applying Causal Models in Nutrition Science
- 58:54 Key Ideas Segment (Premium-only)
- Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course
- Go to episode page
- Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium
- Receive our free weekly email: the Sigma Synopsis
- Related episode: 343 – Understanding Causality in Nutrition Science
536 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 432754005 series 2461191
Content provided by Danny Lennon. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Danny Lennon or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
In the realm of nutrition science and health, understanding the intricate relationship between various factors and health outcomes is crucial yet challenging. How do we determine whether a specific nutrient genuinely impacts our health, or if the observed effects are merely coincidental? This intriguing question brings us to the core concepts of correlation and causation. You’ve likely heard the adage “correlation is not causation,” but what does this truly mean in the context of scientific research and public health recommendations? Can a strong association between two variables ever imply a causal relationship, or is it always just a statistical coincidence? These questions are not merely academic; they are pivotal in shaping the guidelines that influence our daily lives. For instance, when studies reveal a link between high sodium intake and hypertension, how do scientists distinguish between a mere correlation and a true causal relationship? Similarly, the debate around LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease hinges on understanding whether high cholesterol levels directly cause heart disease, or if other confounding factors are at play. Unraveling these complexities requires a deep dive into the standards of proof and the different models used to assess causality in scientific research. As we delve into these topics, we’ll explore how public health recommendations are formed despite the inherent challenges in proving causality. What methods do scientists use to ensure that their findings are robust and reliable? How do they account for the myriad of confounding variables that can skew results? By understanding the nuances of these processes, we can better appreciate the rigorous scientific effort that underpins dietary guidelines and health advisories. Join us on this exploration of correlation, causation, and the standards of proof in nutrition science. Through real-world examples and critical discussions, we will illuminate the pathways from observational studies to actionable health recommendations. Are you ready to uncover the mechanisms that bridge the gap between scientific evidence and practical health advice? Let’s dive in and discover the fascinating dynamics at play. Timestamps:
…
continue reading
- 01:32 Understanding Correlation and Causation
- 03:54 Historical Perspectives on Causality
- 06:33 Causal Models in Health Sciences
- 14:53 Probabilistic vs. Deterministic Causation
- 30:52 Standards of Proof in Public Health
- 36:44 Applying Causal Models in Nutrition Science
- 58:54 Key Ideas Segment (Premium-only)
- Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course
- Go to episode page
- Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium
- Receive our free weekly email: the Sigma Synopsis
- Related episode: 343 – Understanding Causality in Nutrition Science
536 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.